V200CP Point of Sale Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report VeriFone Inc

VeriFone Inc Point of Sale Terminal

FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
1 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
FCC SAR Test Report
Report No.
:
SA171114C19
Applicant
:
Verifone, Inc.
Address
:
1400 West Stanford Ranch Road Suite 200 Rocklin CA 95765 USA
Product
:
Point of Sale Terminal
FCC ID
:
B32V200CP
Brand
:
Verifone
Model No.
:
V400c Plus
Standards
:
FCC 47 CFR Part 2 (2.1093), IEEE C95.1:1992, IEEE Std 1528:2013
KDB 865664 D01 v01r04, KDB 865664 D02 v01r02
KDB 248227 D01 v02r02, KDB 447498 D01 v06
Sample Received Date
:
Nov. 15, 2017
Date of Testing
:
Dec. 12, 2017 ~ Dec. 21, 2017
Lab Address
:
No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Test Location
:
No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil, Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City 33383, Taiwan (R.O.C)
CERTIFICATION: The above equipment have been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.)
Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lin Kou Laboratories, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards.
The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and
accurate accounts of the measurements of the samples SAR characteristics under the conditions specified in this
report. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not
use it to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies.
Evonne Liu / Specialist
Eli Hsu / Supervisor
This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only
with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are
not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically
and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60
days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in
writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified
acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of
measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
2 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
Table of Contents
Release Control Record ............................................................................................................................................................... 3
1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value ....................................................................................................................................... 4
2. Description of Equipment Under Test ................................................................................................................................. 5
3. SAR Measurement System ................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.1 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) ............................................................................................................... 6
3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System ............................................................................................................................................. 6
3.2.1 Robot.................................................................................................................................................................. 7
3.2.2 Probes ................................................................................................................................................................ 8
3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) .................................................................................................................... 9
3.2.4 Phantoms ........................................................................................................................................................... 9
3.2.5 Device Holder ................................................................................................................................................... 10
3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles ................................................................................................................................ 10
3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids ................................................................................................................................. 11
3.3 SAR System Verification ............................................................................................................................................ 14
3.4 SAR Measurement Procedure ................................................................................................................................... 15
3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 15
3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure................................................................................................................................... 15
3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring ...................................................................................................................................... 16
3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 16
3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods ................................................................................................................................... 16
4. SAR Measurement Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................ 17
4.1 EUT Configuration and Setting ................................................................................................................................... 17
4.2 EUT Testing Position .................................................................................................................................................. 18
4.3 Tissue Verification ...................................................................................................................................................... 19
4.4 System Validation ....................................................................................................................................................... 19
4.5 System Verification ..................................................................................................................................................... 20
4.6 Maximum Output Power ............................................................................................................................................. 21
4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power ................................................................................................................. 21
4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result ................................................................................................................. 21
4.7 SAR Testing Results .................................................................................................................................................. 22
4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations ................................................................................................................ 22
4.7.2 SAR Results for Body Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) .............................................. 23
4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) ....................................... 23
4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability ........................................................................................................................... 24
4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation .......................................................................................... 24
5. Calibration of Test Equipment ............................................................................................................................................ 25
6. Measurement Uncertainty ................................................................................................................................................... 26
7. Information on the Testing Laboratories ........................................................................................................................... 28
Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification
Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement
Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole
Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
3 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
Release Control Record
Report No.
Reason for Change
Date Issued
SA171114C19
Initial release
Dec. 22, 2017
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
4 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value
Equipment
Class
Mode
Highest SAR-1g
Body
Tested at 0 mm
(W/kg)
Highest SAR-10g
Extremity
Tested at 0 mm
(W/kg)
DTS
2.4G WLAN
0.21
0.34
NII
5G WLAN
0.92
0.36
DSS
Bluetooth
0.01
0.02
Note:
1. The SAR criteria (Head & Body: SAR-1g 1.6 W/kg, and Extremity: SAR-10g 4.0 W/kg) for general population /
uncontrolled exposure is specified in FCC 47 CFR part 2 (2.1093) and ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
5 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
2. Description of Equipment Under Test
EUT Type
Point of Sale Terminal
FCC ID
B32V200CP
Brand Name
Verifone
Model Name
V400c Plus
Tx Frequency Bands
(Unit: MHz)
WLAN : 2412 ~ 2462, 5180 ~ 5240, 5260 ~ 5320, 5500 ~ 5700, 5745 ~ 5825
Bluetooth : 2402 ~ 2480
NFC : 13.56
Uplink Modulations
802.11b : DSSS
802.11a/g/n : OFDM
Bluetooth : GFSK, π/4-DQPSK, 8-DPSK
NFC : ASK
Maximum Tune-up Conducted Power
(Unit: dBm)
Please refer to section 4.6.1 of this report
Antenna Type
PIFA Antenna
(Peak Antenna Gain : 1.48 dBi for 2.4GHz, 2.96 dBi for 5GHz)
EUT Stage
Identical Prototype
Note:
1. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description please refers
to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
6 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
3. SAR Measurement System
3.1 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)
SAR is related to the rate at which energy is absorbed per unit mass in an object exposed to a radio field. The SAR
distribution in a biological body is complicated and is usually carried out by experimental techniques or numerical
modeling. The standard recommends limits for two tiers of groups, occupational/controlled and general
population/uncontrolled, based on a person’s awareness and ability to exercise control over his or her exposure. In
general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are higher than the limits for general population/uncontrolled.
The SAR definition is the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dW) absorbed by (dissipated in) an
incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dv) of a given density (ρ). The equation description is as
below:
SAR is expressed in units of Watts per kilogram (W/kg)
SAR measurement can be related to the electrical field in the tissue by
Where: σ is the conductivity of the tissue, ρ is the mass density of the tissue and E is the RMS electrical field
strength.
3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System
DASY52 system consists of high precision robot, probe alignment sensor, phantom, robot controller, controlled
measurement server and near-field probe. The robot includes six axes that can move to the precision position of the
DASY52 software defined. The DASY52 software can define the area that is detected by the probe. The robot is
connected to controlled box. Controlled measurement server is connected to the controlled robot box. The DAE
includes amplifier, signal multiplexing, AD converter, offset measurement and surface detection. It is connected to
the Electro-optical coupler (ECO). The ECO performs the conversion form the optical into digital electric signal of the
DAE and transfers data to the PC.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
7 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
Fig-3.1 SPEAG DASY52 System Setup
3.2.1 Robot
The DASY52 system uses the high precision robots from Stäubli SA (France). For the 6-axis controller system, the
robot controller version of CS8c from Stäubli is used. The Stäubli robot series have many features that are important
for our application:
High precision (repeatability ±0.035 mm)
High reliability (industrial design)
Jerk-free straight movements
Low ELF interference (the closed metallic construction shields against motor control fields)
Fig-3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
8 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
3.2.2 Probes
The SAR measurement is conducted with the dosimetric probe. The probe is specially designed and calibrated for
use in liquid with high permittivity. The dosimetric probe has special calibration in liquid at different frequency.
Model
EX3DV4
Construction
Symmetrical design with triangular core. Built-in shielding against
static charges. PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic
solvents, e.g., DGBE).
Frequency
10 MHz to 6 GHz
Linearity: ± 0.2 dB
Directivity
± 0.3 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis)
± 0.5 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis)
Dynamic Range
10 µW/g to 100 mW/g
Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (noise: typically < 1 µW/g)
Dimensions
Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm)
Tip diameter: 2.5 mm (Body: 12 mm)
Typical distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1 mm
Model
ES3DV3
Construction
Symmetrical design with triangular core. Interleaved sensors.
Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material
(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE).
Frequency
10 MHz to 4 GHz
Linearity: ± 0.2 dB
Directivity
± 0.2 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis)
± 0.3 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis)
Dynamic Range
5 µW/g to 100 mW/g
Linearity: ± 0.2 dB
Dimensions
Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm)
Tip diameter: 3.9 mm (Body: 12 mm)
Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.0 mm
Model
ET3DV6
Construction
Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for
surface detection system.
Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material
(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE)
Frequency
10 MHz to 2.3 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB
Directivity
± 0.2 dB in TSL (rotation around probe axis)
± 0.4 dB in TSL (rotation normal to probe axis)
Dynamic Range
5 µW/g to 100 mW/g; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB
Dimensions
Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 16 mm)
Tip diameter: 6.8 mm (Body: 12 mm)
Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
9 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE)
Model
DAE3, DAE4
Construction
Signal amplifier, multiplexer, A/D converter and control logic.
Serial optical link for communication with DASY embedded
system (fully remote controlled). Two step probe touch detector
for mechanical surface detection and emergency robot stop.
Measurement
Range
-100 to +300 mV (16 bit resolution and two range settings: 4mV,
400mV)
Input Offset
Voltage
< 5µV (with auto zero)
Input Bias Current
< 50 fA
Dimensions
60 x 60 x 68 mm
3.2.4 Phantoms
Model
Twin SAM
Construction
The shell corresponds to the specifications of the Specific
Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE
1528 and IEC 62209-1. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of
left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage
at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents evaporation of the
liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete
setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement
grids by teaching three points with the robot.
Material
Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF)
Shell Thickness
2 ± 0.2 mm (6 ± 0.2 mm at ear point)
Dimensions
Length: 1000 mm
Width: 500 mm
Height: adjustable feet
Filling Volume
approx. 25 liters
Model
ELI
Construction
Phantom for compliance testing of handheld and body-mounted
wireless devices in the frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz. ELI
is fully compatible with the IEC 62209-2 standard and all known
tissue simulating liquids. ELI has been optimized regarding its
performance and can be integrated into our standard phantom
tables. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference
markings on the phantom allow installation of the complete setup,
including all predefined phantom positions and measurement
grids, by teaching three points. The phantom is compatible with
all SPEAG dosimetric probes and dipoles.
Material
Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF)
Shell Thickness
2.0 ± 0.2 mm (bottom plate)
Dimensions
Major axis: 600 mm
Minor axis: 400 mm
Filling Volume
approx. 30 liters
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
10 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
3.2.5 Device Holder
Model
Mounting Device
Construction
In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom or ELI4, the
Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter
device in spherical coordinates. Rotation point is the ear opening
point. Transmitter devices can be easily and accurately
positioned according to IEC, IEEE, FCC or other specifications.
The device holder can be locked for positioning at different
phantom sections (left head, right head, flat).
Material
POM
Model
Laptop Extensions Kit
Construction
Simple but effective and easy-to-use extension for Mounting
Device that facilitates the testing of larger devices according to
IEC 62209-2 (e.g., laptops, cameras, etc.). It is lightweight and
fits easily on the upper part of the Mounting Device in place of the
phone positioner.
Material
POM, Acrylic glass, Foam
3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles
Model
D-Serial
Construction
Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun. Enables measurement of feed
point impedance with NWA. Matched for use near flat phantoms
filled with tissue simulating solutions.
Frequency
750 MHz to 5800 MHz
Return Loss
> 20 dB
Power Capability
> 100 W (f < 1GHz), > 40 W (f > 1GHz)
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
11 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids
For SAR measurement of the field distribution inside the phantom, the phantom must be filled with homogeneous
tissue simulating liquid to a depth of at least 15 cm. For head SAR testing, the liquid height from the ear reference
point (ERP) of the phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. For body SAR testing, the liquid height
from the center of the flat phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. The nominal dielectric values of the
tissue simulating liquids in the phantom and the tolerance of 5% are listed in Table-3.1.
Photo of Liquid Height for Head Position
Photo of Liquid Height for Body Position
The dielectric properties of the head tissue simulating liquids are defined in IEEE 1528 and IEC 62209-1. For the
body tissue simulating liquids, the dielectric properties are defined in RSS-102 Annex D and IEC 62209-2. The
dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquids were verified prior to the SAR evaluation using a dielectric
assessment kit and a network analyzer.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
12 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
Table-3.1 Targets of Tissue Simulating Liquid
Frequency
(MHz)
Target
Permittivity
Range of
±5%
Target
Conductivity
Range of
±5%
For Head
750
41.9
39.8 ~ 44.0
0.89
0.85 ~ 0.93
835
41.5
39.4 ~ 43.6
0.90
0.86 ~ 0.95
900
41.5
39.4 ~ 43.6
0.97
0.92 ~ 1.02
1450
40.5
38.5 ~ 42.5
1.20
1.14 ~ 1.26
1640
40.3
38.3 ~ 42.3
1.29
1.23 ~ 1.35
1750
40.1
38.1 ~ 42.1
1.37
1.30 ~ 1.44
1800
40.0
38.0 ~ 42.0
1.40
1.33 ~ 1.47
1900
40.0
38.0 ~ 42.0
1.40
1.33 ~ 1.47
2000
40.0
38.0 ~ 42.0
1.40
1.33 ~ 1.47
2300
39.5
37.5 ~ 41.5
1.67
1.59 ~ 1.75
2450
39.2
37.2 ~ 41.2
1.80
1.71 ~ 1.89
2600
39.0
37.1 ~ 41.0
1.96
1.86 ~ 2.06
3500
37.9
36.0 ~ 39.8
2.91
2.76 ~ 3.06
5200
36.0
34.2 ~ 37.8
4.66
4.43 ~ 4.89
5300
35.9
34.1 ~ 37.7
4.76
4.52 ~ 5.00
5500
35.6
33.8 ~ 37.4
4.96
4.71 ~ 5.21
5600
35.5
33.7 ~ 37.3
5.07
4.82 ~ 5.32
5800
35.3
33.5 ~ 37.1
5.27
5.01 ~ 5.53
For Body
750
55.5
52.7 ~ 58.3
0.96
0.91 ~ 1.01
835
55.2
52.4 ~ 58.0
0.97
0.92 ~ 1.02
900
55.0
52.3 ~ 57.8
1.05
1.00 ~ 1.10
1450
54.0
51.3 ~ 56.7
1.30
1.24 ~ 1.37
1640
53.8
51.1 ~ 56.5
1.40
1.33 ~ 1.47
1750
53.4
50.7 ~ 56.1
1.49
1.42 ~ 1.56
1800
53.3
50.6 ~ 56.0
1.52
1.44 ~ 1.60
1900
53.3
50.6 ~ 56.0
1.52
1.44 ~ 1.60
2000
53.3
50.6 ~ 56.0
1.52
1.44 ~ 1.60
2300
52.9
50.3 ~ 55.5
1.81
1.72 ~ 1.90
2450
52.7
50.1 ~ 55.3
1.95
1.85 ~ 2.05
2600
52.5
49.9 ~ 55.1
2.16
2.05 ~ 2.27
3500
51.3
48.7 ~ 53.9
3.31
3.14 ~ 3.48
5200
49.0
46.6 ~ 51.5
5.30
5.04 ~ 5.57
5300
48.9
46.5 ~ 51.3
5.42
5.15 ~ 5.69
5500
48.6
46.2 ~ 51.0
5.65
5.37 ~ 5.93
5600
48.5
46.1 ~ 50.9
5.77
5.48 ~ 6.06
5800
48.2
45.8 ~ 50.6
6.00
5.70 ~ 6.30
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
13 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
The following table gives the recipes for tissue simulating liquids.
Table-3.2 Recipes of Tissue Simulating Liquid
Tissue
Type
Bactericide
DGBE
HEC
NaCl
Sucrose
Triton
X-100
Water
Diethylene
Glycol
Mono-
hexylether
H750
0.2
-
0.2
1.5
56.0
-
42.1
-
H835
0.2
-
0.2
1.5
57.0
-
41.1
-
H900
0.2
-
0.2
1.4
58.0
-
40.2
-
H1450
-
43.3
-
0.6
-
-
56.1
-
H1640
-
45.8
-
0.5
-
-
53.7
-
H1750
-
47.0
-
0.4
-
-
52.6
-
H1800
-
44.5
-
0.3
-
-
55.2
-
H1900
-
44.5
-
0.2
-
-
55.3
-
H2000
-
44.5
-
0.1
-
-
55.4
-
H2300
-
44.9
-
0.1
-
-
55.0
-
H2450
-
45.0
-
0.1
-
-
54.9
-
H2600
-
45.1
-
0.1
-
-
54.8
-
H3500
-
8.0
-
0.2
-
20.0
71.8
-
H5G
-
-
-
-
-
17.2
65.5
17.3
B750
0.2
-
0.2
0.8
48.8
-
50.0
-
B835
0.2
-
0.2
0.9
48.5
-
50.2
-
B900
0.2
-
0.2
0.9
48.2
-
50.5
-
B1450
-
34.0
-
0.3
-
-
65.7
-
B1640
-
32.5
-
0.3
-
-
67.2
-
B1750
-
31.0
-
0.2
-
-
68.8
-
B1800
-
29.5
-
0.4
-
-
70.1
-
B1900
-
29.5
-
0.3
-
-
70.2
-
B2000
-
30.0
-
0.2
-
-
69.8
-
B2300
-
31.0
-
0.1
-
-
68.9
-
B2450
-
31.4
-
0.1
-
-
68.5
-
B2600
-
31.8
-
0.1
-
-
68.1
-
B3500
-
28.8
-
0.1
-
-
71.1
-
B5G
-
-
-
-
-
10.7
78.6
10.7
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
14 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
3.3 SAR System Verification
The system check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. It is performed daily or before every
SAR measurement. The system check uses normal SAR measurements in the flat section of the phantom with a
matched dipole at a specified distance. The system verification setup is shown as below.
Fig-3.3 System Verification Setup
The validation dipole is placed beneath the flat phantom with the specific spacer in place. The distance spacer is
touch the phantom surface with a light pressure at the reference marking and be oriented parallel to the long side of
the phantom. The spectrum analyzer measures the forward power at the location of the system check dipole
connector. The signal generator is adjusted for the desired forward power (250 mW is used for 700 MHz to 3 GHz,
100 mW is used for 3.5 GHz to 6 GHz) at the dipole connector and the power meter is read at that level. After
connecting the cable to the dipole, the signal generator is readjusted for the same reading at power meter.
After system check testing, the SAR result will be normalized to 1W forward input power and compared with the
reference SAR value derived from validation dipole certificate report. The deviation of system check should be within
10 %.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
15 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
3.4 SAR Measurement Procedure
According to the SAR test standard, the recommended procedure for assessing the peak spatial-average SAR value
consists of the following steps:
(a) Power reference measurement
(b) Area scan
(c) Zoom scan
(d) Power drift measurement
The SAR measurement procedures for each of test conditions are as follows:
(a) Make EUT to transmit maximum output power
(b) Measure conducted output power through RF cable
(c) Place the EUT in the specific position of phantom
(d) Perform SAR testing steps on the DASY system
(e) Record the SAR value
3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure
First Area Scan is used to locate the approximate location(s) of the local peak SAR value(s). The measurement grid
within an Area Scan is defined by the grid extent, grid step size and grid offset. Next, in order to determine the EM
field distribution in a three-dimensional spatial extension, Zoom Scan is required. The Zoom Scan is performed
around the highest E-field value to determine the averaged SAR-distribution over 10 g. According to KDB 865664
D01, the resolution for Area and Zoom scan is specified in the table below.
Items
<= 2 GHz
2-3 GHz
3-4 GHz
4-5 GHz
5-6 GHz
Area Scan
(Δx, Δy)
<= 15 mm
<= 12 mm
<= 12 mm
<= 10 mm
<= 10 mm
Zoom Scan
(Δx, Δy)
<= 8 mm
<= 5 mm
<= 5 mm
<= 4 mm
<= 4 mm
Zoom Scan
(Δz)
<= 5 mm
<= 5 mm
<= 4 mm
<= 3 mm
<= 2 mm
Zoom Scan
Volume
>= 30 mm
>= 30 mm
>= 28 mm
>= 25 mm
>= 22 mm
Note:
When zoom scan is required and report SAR is <= 1.4 W/kg, the zoom scan resolution of Δx / Δy (2-3GHz: <= 8 mm,
3-4GHz: <= 7 mm, 4-6GHz: <= 5 mm) may be applied.
3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure
The volume scan is used for assess overlapping SAR distributions for antennas transmitting in different frequency
bands. It is equivalent to an oversized zoom scan used in standalone measurements. The measurement volume will
be used to enclose all the simultaneous transmitting antennas. For antennas transmitting simultaneously in different
frequency bands, the volume scan is measured separately in each frequency band. In order to sum correctly to
compute the 1g aggregate SAR, the EUT remain in the same test position for all measurements and all volume scan
use the same spatial resolution and grid spacing. When all volume scan were completed, the software, SEMCAD
postprocessor can combine and subsequently superpose these measurement data to calculating the multiband
SAR.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
16 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring
All SAR testing is under the EUT install full charged battery and transmit maximum output power. In DASY
measurement software, the power reference measurement and power drift measurement procedures are used for
monitoring the power drift of EUT during SAR test. Both these procedures measure the field at a specified reference
position before and after the SAR testing. The software will calculate the field difference in dB. If the power drift more
than 5%, the SAR will be retested.
3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation
The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the test standard. It can be
conducted for 1g and 10g, as well as for user-specific masses. The DASY software includes all numerical
procedures necessary to evaluate the spatial peak SAR value.
The base for the evaluation is a "cube" measurement. The measured volume must include the 1g and 10g cubes
with the highest averaged SAR values. For that purpose, the center of the measured volume is aligned to the
interpolated peak SAR value of a previously performed area scan.
The entire evaluation of the spatial peak values is performed within the post-processing engine (SEMCAD). The
system always gives the maximum values for the 1g and 10g cubes. The algorithm to find the cube with highest
averaged SAR is divided into the following stages:
(a) Extraction of the measured data (grid and values) from the Zoom Scan
(b) Calculation of the SAR value at every measurement point based on all stored data (A/D values and
measurement parameters)
(c) Generation of a high-resolution mesh within the measured volume
(d) Interpolation of all measured values form the measurement grid to the high-resolution grid
(e) Extrapolation of the entire 3-D field distribution to the phantom surface over the distance from sensor to surface
(f) Calculation of the averaged SAR within masses of 1g and 10g
3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods
In DASY, the interpolation and extrapolation are both based on the modified Quadratic Shepard’s method. The
interpolation scheme combines a least-square fitted function method and a weighted average method which are the
two basic types of computational interpolation and approximation.
Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner
phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor
offset. The uncertainty increases with the extrapolation distance. To keep the uncertainty within 1% for the 1 g and
10 g cubes, the extrapolation distance should not be larger than 5 mm.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
17 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
4. SAR Measurement Evaluation
4.1 EUT Configuration and Setting
<Considerations Related to WLAN for Setup and Testing>
In general, various vendor specific external test software and chipset based internal test modes are typically used
for SAR measurement. These chipset based test mode utilities are generally hardware and manufacturer dependent,
and often include substantial flexibility to reconfigure or reprogram a device. A Wi-Fi device must be configured to
transmit continuously at the required data rate, channel bandwidth and signal modulation, using the highest
transmission duty factor supported by the test mode tools for SAR measurement. The test frequencies established
using test mode must correspond to the actual channel frequencies. When 802.11 frame gaps are accounted for in
the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically achievable in most test mode
configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid certain hardware and device
implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. In addition, a periodic transmission duty factor is required
for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR correctly. The reported SAR must be scaled to 100%
transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit.
According to KDB 248227 D01, this device has installed WLAN engineering testing software which can provide
continuous transmitting RF signal. During WLAN SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at
the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and
maximum output power.
Initial Test Configuration
An initial test configuration is determined for OFDM transmission modes in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands according to
the channel bandwidth, modulation and data rate combination(s) with the highest maximum output power specified
for production units in each standalone and aggregated frequency band. When the same maximum power is
specified for multiple transmission modes in a frequency band, the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order
modulation, lowest data rate and lowest order 802.11a/g/n/ac mode is used for SAR measurement, on the highest
measured output power channel in the initial test configuration, for each frequency band.
Subsequent Test Configuration
SAR measurement requirements for the remaining 802.11 transmission mode configurations that have not been
tested in the initial test configuration are determined separately for each standalone and aggregated frequency band,
in each exposure condition, according to the maximum output power specified for production units. Additional power
measurements may be required to determine if SAR measurements are required for subsequent highest output
power channels in a subsequent test configuration. When the highest reported SAR for the initial test configuration
according to the initial test position or fixed exposure position requirements, is adjusted by the ratio of the
subsequent test configuration to initial test configuration specified maximum output power and the adjusted SAR is
1.2 W/kg, SAR is not required for that subsequent test configuration.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
18 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
SAR Test Configuration and Channel Selection
When multiple channel bandwidth configurations in a frequency band have the same specified maximum output
power, the initial test configuration is using largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate,
and lowest order 802.11 mode (i.e., 802.11a is chosen over 802.11n then 802.11ac or 802.11g is chosen over
802.11n). After an initial test configuration is determined, if multiple test channels have the same measured
maximum output power, the channel chosen for SAR measurement is determined according to the following.
1) The channel closest to mid-band frequency is selected for SAR measurement.
2) For channels with equal separation from mid-band frequency; for example, high and low channels or two
mid-band channels, the higher frequency (number) channel is selected for SAR measurement.
Test Reduction for U-NII-1 (5.2 GHz) and U-NII-2A (5.3 GHz) Bands
For devices that operate in both U-NII bands using the same transmitter and antenna(s), SAR test reduction is
determined according to the following.
1) When the same maximum output power is specified for both bands, begin SAR measurement in U-NII-2A band by
applying the OFDM SAR requirements. If the highest reported SAR for a test configuration is ≤ 1.2 W/kg, SAR is not
required for U-NII-1 band for that configuration (802.11 mode and exposure condition).
2) When different maximum output power is specified for the bands, begin SAR measurement in the band with
higher specified maximum output power. The highest reported SAR for the tested configuration is adjusted by the
ratio of lower to higher specified maximum output power for the two bands. When the adjusted SAR is 1.2 W/kg,
SAR is not required for the band with lower maximum output power in that test configuration.
<Considerations Related to Bluetooth for Setup and Testing>
This device has installed Bluetooth engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF
signal. During Bluetooth SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum
transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output
power.
4.2 EUT Testing Position
This hand-held device was test on the extremity and body exposure conditions. Body SAR was tested on the Rear
Face (the edge which is the closest to transmitting antenna) with 0 cm separation distance. Extremity SAR was
tested on the Rear Face, Left Side and Right Side with 0 cm separation distance.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
19 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
4.3 Tissue Verification
The measuring results for tissue simulating liquid are shown as below.
Test
Date
Tissue
Type
Frequency
(MHz)
Liquid
Temp.
()
Measured
Conductivity
(σ)
Measured
Permittivity
r)
Target
Conductivity
(σ)
Target
Permittivity
r)
Conductivity
Deviation
(%)
Permittivity
Deviation
(%)
Dec. 12, 2017
Body
2450
23.3
2.021
52.11
1.95
52.7
3.64
-1.12
Dec. 16, 2017
Body
2450
23.4
1.997
51.334
1.95
52.7
2.41
-2.59
Dec. 21, 2017
Body
2450
23.3
1.963
51.137
1.95
52.7
0.67
-2.97
Dec. 12, 2017
Body
5250
23
5.475
47.871
5.36
48.9
2.15
-2.10
Dec. 12, 2017
Body
5600
23
5.961
47.19
5.77
48.5
3.31
-2.70
Dec. 12, 2017
Body
5800
23
6.254
46.801
6.00
48.2
4.23
-2.90
Note:
The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquid must be measured within 24 hours before the SAR testing
and within ±5% of the target values. Liquid temperature during the SAR testing must be within ±2 .
4.4 System Validation
The SAR measurement system was validated according to procedures in KDB 865664 D01. The validation status in
tabulated summary is as below.
Test
Date
Probe
S/N
Calibration Point
Measured
Conductivity
(σ)
Measured
Permittivity
r)
Validation for CW
Validation for Modulation
Sensitivity
Range
Probe
Linearity
Probe
Isotropy
Modulation
Type
Duty Factor
PAR
Dec. 12, 2017
3971
Body
2450
2.021
52.11
Pass
Pass
Pass
OFDM
N/A
Pass
Dec. 16, 2017
3971
Body
2450
1.997
51.334
Pass
Pass
Pass
OFDM
N/A
Pass
Dec. 21, 2017
7346
Body
2450
1.963
51.137
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dec. 12, 2017
3971
Body
5250
5.475
47.871
Pass
Pass
Pass
OFDM
N/A
Pass
Dec. 12, 2017
3971
Body
5600
5.961
47.19
Pass
Pass
Pass
OFDM
N/A
Pass
Dec. 12, 2017
3971
Body
5800
6.254
46.801
Pass
Pass
Pass
OFDM
N/A
Pass
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
20 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
4.5 System Verification
The measuring result for system verification is tabulated as below.
Test
Date
Mode
Frequency
(MHz)
1W Target
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
Measured
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
Normalized
to 1W
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
Deviation
(%)
Dipole
S/N
Probe
S/N
DAE
S/N
Dec. 12, 2017
Body
2450
12.50
50.00
49.70
0.60
737
3971
861
Dec. 16, 2017
Body
2450
12.30
49.20
49.70
-1.01
737
3971
861
Dec. 12, 2017
Body
5250
7.94
79.40
76.50
3.79
1019
3971
861
Dec. 12, 2017
Body
5600
8.13
81.30
79.70
2.01
1019
3971
861
Dec. 12, 2017
Body
5800
7.77
77.70
76.90
1.04
1019
3971
861
Test
Date
Mode
Frequency
(MHz)
1W Target
SAR-10g
(W/kg)
Measured
SAR-10g
(W/kg)
Normalized
to 1W
SAR-10g
(W/kg)
Deviation
(%)
Dipole
S/N
Probe
S/N
DAE
S/N
Dec. 12, 2017
Extremity
2450
23.40
5.81
23.24
-0.68
737
3971
861
Dec. 16, 2017
Extremity
2450
23.40
5.74
22.96
-1.88
737
3971
861
Dec. 21, 2017
Extremity
2450
23.40
5.70
22.80
-2.56
737
7346
679
Dec. 12, 2017
Extremity
5250
21.30
2.25
22.50
5.63
1019
3971
861
Dec. 12, 2017
Extremity
5600
22.30
2.27
22.70
1.79
1019
3971
861
Dec. 12, 2017
Extremity
5800
21.30
2.17
21.70
1.88
1019
3971
861
Note:
Comparing to the reference SAR value provided by SPEAG, the validation data should be within its specification of
10 %. The result indicates the system check can meet the variation criterion and the plots can be referred to
Appendix A of this report.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
21 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
4.6 Maximum Output Power
4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power
The maximum conducted average power (Unit: dBm) including tune-up tolerance is shown as below.
Mode
2.4G WLAN
5.2G WLAN
5.3G WLAN
5.6G WLAN
5.8G WLAN
802.11b
16.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
802.11g
14.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
802.11a
N/A
11.5
11.0
11.0
11.0
802.11n HT20
13.0
11.5
11.0
11.0
11.0
802.11n HT40
N/A
10.5
11.5
11.0
11.0
Mode
2.4G Bluetooth
Bluetooth DH
10.0
Bluetooth 2DH
10.0
Bluetooth 3DH
10.0
Bluetooth LE
6.0
4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result
The measuring conducted average power (Unit: dBm) is shown as below.
<WLAN 2.4G>
Mode
Channel
Frequency (MHz)
Average Power
802.11b
1
2412
15.38
6
2437
15.49
11
2462
15.58
<WLAN 5.3G>
Mode
Channel
Frequency (MHz)
Average Power
802.11n (HT40)
54
5270
11.04
62
5310
10.85
<WLAN 5.6G>
Mode
Channel
Frequency (MHz)
Average Power
802.11n (HT40)
102
5510
10.7
110
5550
10.79
118
5590
10.79
126
5630
10.86
134
5670
10.54
<WLAN 5.8G>
Mode
Channel
Frequency (MHz)
Average Power
802.11n (HT40)
151
5755
10.71
159
5795
10.44
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
22 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
<Bluetooth>
Mode
Channel
Frequency (MHz)
Average Power
Bluetooth EDR
0
2402
9.44
39
2441
9.61
78
2480
9.44
Bluetooth LE
0
2402
5.6
19
2440
5.58
39
2480
5.57
4.7 SAR Testing Results
4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations
<KDB 447498 D01, General RF Exposure Guidance>
Testing of other required channels within the operating mode of a frequency band is not required when the reported
SAR for the mid-band or highest output power channel is:
(1) ≤ 0.8 W/kg or 2.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is ≤ 100 MHz
(2) ≤ 0.6 W/kg or 1.5 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is between 100 MHz and 200
MHz
(3) ≤ 0.4 W/kg or 1.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is ≥ 200 MHz
<KDB 248227 D01, SAR Guidance for Wi-Fi Transmitters>
(1) For handsets operating next to ear, hotspot mode or mini-tablet configurations, the initial test position
procedures were applied. The test position with the highest extrapolated peak SAR will be used as the initial
test position. When the reported SAR of initial test position is <= 0.4 W/kg, SAR testing for remaining test
positions is not required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the subsequent highest peak SAR positions until the
reported SAR result is <= 0.8 W/kg or all test positions are measured.
(2) For WLAN 2.4 GHz, the highest measured maximum output power channel for DSSS was selected for SAR
measurement. When the reported SAR is <= 0.8 W/kg, no further SAR testing is required. Otherwise, SAR is
evaluated at the next highest measured output power channel. When any reported SAR is > 1.2 W/kg, SAR is
required for the third channel. For OFDM modes (802.11g/n), SAR is not required when the highest reported
SAR for DSSS is adjusted by the ratio of OFDM to DSSS specified maximum output power and it is <= 1.2
W/kg.
(3) For WLAN 5 GHz, the initial test configuration was selected according to the transmission mode with the
highest maximum output power. When the reported SAR of initial test configuration is > 0.8 W/kg, SAR is
required for the subsequent highest measured output power channel until the reported SAR result is <= 1.2
W/kg or all required channels are measured. For other transmission modes, SAR is not required when the
highest reported SAR for initial test configuration is adjusted by the ratio of subsequent test configuration to
initial test configuration specified maximum output power and it is <= 1.2 W/kg.
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
23 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
4.7.2 SAR Results for Body Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm)
Plot
No.
Band
Mode
Test
Position
Ch.
Max.
Tune-up
Power
(dBm)
Measured
Conducted
Power
(dBm)
Scaling
Factor
Power
Drift
(dB)
Measured
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
Scaled
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
01
2.4G WLAN
802.11b
Rear Face
11
16.0
15.58
1.10
0.02
0.191
0.21
02
5.3G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Rear Face
54
11.5
11.04
1.11
-0.03
0.679
0.75
03
5.6G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Rear Face
126
11.0
10.86
1.03
-0.16
0.705
0.73
04
5.8G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Rear Face
151
11.0
10.71
1.07
-0.12
0.862
0.92
5.8G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Rear Face
159
11.0
10.44
1.14
0.03
0.751
0.85
5.8G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Rear Face
151
11.0
10.71
1.07
-0.04
0.853
0.91
Plot
No.
Band
Test
Position
Ch.
Max.
Tune-up
Power
(dBm)
Measured
Conducted
Power
(dBm)
Scaling
Factor
Power
Drift
(dB)
Measured
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
Scaled
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
05
BT
Rear Face
39
10.0
9.61
1.09
0.16
0.012
0.01
4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm)
Plot
No.
Band
Mode
Test
Position
Ch.
Max.
Tune-up
Power
(dBm)
Measured
Conducted
Power
(dBm)
Scaling
Factor
Power
Drift
(dB)
Measured
SAR-10g
(W/kg)
Scaled
SAR-10g
(W/kg)
2.4G WLAN
802.11b
Rear Face
11
16.0
15.58
1.10
0.02
0.104
0.11
06
2.4G WLAN
802.11b
Left Side
11
16.0
15.58
1.10
0.08
0.313
0.34
2.4G WLAN
802.11b
Right Side
11
16.0
15.58
1.10
0.05
0.049
0.05
07
5.3G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Rear Face
54
11.5
11.04
1.11
-0.03
0.263
0.29
5.3G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Left Side
54
11.5
11.04
1.11
0.13
0.111
0.12
5.3G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Right Side
54
11.5
11.04
1.11
-0.06
0.101
0.11
08
5.6G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Rear Face
126
11.0
10.86
1.03
-0.16
0.265
0.27
5.6G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Left Side
126
11.0
10.86
1.03
-0.03
0.106
0.11
5.6G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Right Side
126
11.0
10.86
1.03
0.04
0.091
0.09
09
5.8G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Rear Face
151
11.0
10.71
1.07
-0.12
0.333
0.36
5.8G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Left Side
151
11.0
10.71
1.07
-0.11
0.133
0.14
5.8G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Right Side
151
11.0
10.71
1.07
0.03
0.098
0.10
5.8G WLAN
802.11n HT40
Rear Face
159
11.0
10.44
1.14
0.03
0.315
0.36
Plot
No.
Band
Test
Position
Ch.
Max.
Tune-up
Power
(dBm)
Measured
Conducted
Power
(dBm)
Scaling
Factor
Power
Drift
(dB)
Measured
SAR-10g
(W/kg)
Scaled
SAR-10g
(W/kg)
BT
Rear Face
39
10.0
9.61
1.09
0.16
0.00638
0.01
10
BT
Left Side
39
10.0
9.61
1.09
0.10
0.014
0.02
BT
Right Side
39
10.0
9.61
1.09
0.04
0.001
0.00
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
24 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability
According to KDB 865664 D01, SAR measurement variability was assessed for each frequency band, which is
determined by the SAR probe calibration point and tissue-equivalent medium used for the device measurements.
When both head and body tissue-equivalent media are required for SAR measurements in a frequency band, the
variability measurement procedures should be applied to the tissue medium with the highest measured SAR, using
the highest measured SAR configuration for that tissue-equivalent medium. Alternatively, if the highest measured
SAR for both head and body tissue-equivalent media are ≤ 1.45 W/kg and the ratio of these highest SAR values, i.e.,
largest divided by smallest value, is 1.10, the highest SAR configuration for either head or body tissue-equivalent
medium may be used to perform the repeated measurement. These additional measurements are repeated after the
completion of all measurements requiring the same head or body tissue-equivalent medium in a frequency band.
The test device should be returned to ambient conditions (normal room temperature) with the battery fully charged
before it is re-mounted on the device holder for the repeated measurement(s) to minimize any unexpected variations
in the repeated results.
SAR repeated measurement procedure:
1. When the highest measured SAR is < 0.80 W/kg, repeated measurement is not required.
2. When the highest measured SAR is >= 0.80 W/kg, repeat that measurement once.
3. If the ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the original and first repeated measurements is > 1.20, or when the
original or repeated measurement is >= 1.45 W/kg, perform a second repeated measurement.
4. If the ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the original, first and second repeated measurements is > 1.20, and the
original, first or second repeated measurement is >= 1.5 W/kg, perform a third repeated measurement.
Band
Mode
Test
Position
Ch.
Original
Measured
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
1st
Repeated
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
L/S
Ratio
2nd
Repeated
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
L/S
Ratio
3rd
Repeated
SAR-1g
(W/kg)
L/S
Ratio
5.8G WLAN
802.11a
Rear Face
157
0.879
0.866
1.02
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation
There is no simultaneous transmission configuration in this device.
Test Engineer
Willy Chang
, and
Kevin Yao
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
25 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
5. Calibration of Test Equipment
Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
SN
Cal. Date
Cal. Interval
System Validation Dipole
SPEAG
D2450V2
737
Aug. 17, 2017
1 Year
System Validation Dipole
SPEAG
D5GHzV2
1019
Aug. 23, 2017
1 Year
Dosimetric E-Field Probe
SPEAG
EX3DV4
3971
Mar. 24, 2017
1 Year
Dosimetric E-Field Probe
SPEAG
EX3DV4
7346
Oct. 24, 2017
1 Year
Data Acquisition Electronics
SPEAG
DAE4
861
May. 22, 2017
1 Year
Dosimetric E-Field Probe
SPEAG
EX3DV4
7346
Oct. 24, 2017
1 Year
Spectrum Analyzer
R&S
FSL6
102006
Mar. 27, 2017
1 Year
ENA Series Network Analyzer
Agilent
E5071C
MY46214281
Jun. 09, 2017
1 Year
Vector Signal Generator
Anritsu
MG3710A
6201599977
Mar. 27, 2017
1 Year
Power Meter
Anritsu
ML2495A
1218009
Jul. 12, 2017
1 Year
Power Sensor
Anritsu
MA2411B
1207252
Jul. 12, 2017
1 Year
Universal Wireless Test Set
Anritsu
MT8870A/MU8
87000A
6201699387
Sep. 14, 2017
1 Year
Thermometer
YFE
YF-160A
130504591
Mar. 24, 2017
1 Year
Power Amplifier
AR
5S1G4
0339656
Sep. 20, 2017
1 Year
Power Amplifier
mini-circuits
ZVE-8G
05770420A
Sep. 15, 2017
1 Year
Attenuator
MTJ
MTJ6011-03
N/A
Sep. 15, 2017
1 Year
Directional Coupler
Woken
0110A05602O-10
11122702
Sep. 15, 2017
1 Year
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
26 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
6. Measurement Uncertainty
Source of Uncertainty
Uncertainty
%)
Probability
Distribution
Divisor
Ci
(1g)
Ci
(10g)
Standard
Uncertainty
%, 1g)
Standard
Uncertainty
%, 10g)
Vi
Measurement System
Probe Calibration
6.0
Normal
1
1
1
6.0
6.0
Axial Isotropy
4.7
Rectangular
√3
0.5
0.5
1.9
1.9
Hemispherical Isotropy
9.6
Rectangular
√3
0.5
0.5
3.9
3.9
Boundary Effect
1.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
0.6
0.6
Linearity
4.7
Rectangular
√3
1
1
2.7
2.7
Detection Limits
0.25
Rectangular
√3
1
1
0.14
0.14
Probe Modulation Response
3.5
Rectangular
√3
1
1
2.0
2.0
Readout Electronics
0.3
Normal
1
1
1
0.3
0.3
Response Time
0.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
0.0
0.0
Integration Time
1.7
Rectangular
√3
1
1
1.0
1.0
RF Ambient Conditions Noise
3.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
1.7
1.7
RF Ambient Conditions Reflections
3.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
1.7
1.7
Probe Positioner Mechanical Tolerance
0.4
Rectangular
√3
1
1
0.2
0.2
Probe Positioning with Respect to Phantom
2.9
Rectangular
√3
1
1
1.7
1.7
Post-processing
2.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
1.2
1.2
Test Sample Related
Test Sample Positioning
4.38 / 1.35
Normal
1
1
1
4.4
1.4
29
Device Holder Uncertainty
2.9 / 4.1
Normal
1
1
1
2.9
4.1
11
Power Drift of Measurement
5.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
2.9
2.9
Power Scaling
0.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
0.0
0.0
Phantom and Setup
Phantom Uncertainty (Shape and Thickness
Tolerances)
7.2
Rectangular
√3
1
1
4.2
4.2
Liquid Conductivity ( Temperature Uncertainty)
3.24
Rectangular
√3
0.78
0.71
1.5
1.3
Liquid Conductivity (Measured)
2.88
Normal
1
0.78
0.71
2.2
2.0
43
Liquid Permittivity (Temperature Uncertainty)
1.13
Rectangular
√3
0.23
0.26
0.2
0.2
Liquid Permittivity (Measured)
2.50
Normal
1
0.23
0.26
0.6
0.7
54
Combined Standard Uncertainty
± 11.8 %
± 11.3 %
Expanded Uncertainty (K=2)
± 23.6 %
± 22.6 %
Body SAR Uncertainty Budget for Frequency Range of 300 MHz to 3 GHz
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
27 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
Source of Uncertainty
Uncertainty
%)
Probability
Distribution
Divisor
Ci
(1g)
Ci
(10g)
Standard
Uncertainty
%, 1g)
Standard
Uncertainty
%, 10g)
Vi
Measurement System
Probe Calibration
6.55
Normal
1
1
1
6.55
6.55
Axial Isotropy
4.7
Rectangular
√3
0.7
0.7
1.9
1.9
Hemispherical Isotropy
9.6
Rectangular
√3
0.7
0.7
3.9
3.9
Boundary Effect
2.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
1.2
1.2
Linearity
4.7
Rectangular
√3
1
1
2.7
2.7
Detection Limits
0.25
Rectangular
√3
1
1
0.14
0.14
Probe Modulation Response
3.5
Rectangular
√3
1
1
2.0
2.0
Readout Electronics
0.3
Normal
1
1
1
0.3
0.3
Response Time
0.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
0.0
0.0
Integration Time
1.7
Rectangular
√3
1
1
1.0
1.0
RF Ambient Conditions Noise
3.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
1.7
1.7
RF Ambient Conditions Reflections
3.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
1.7
1.7
Probe Positioner Mechanical Tolerance
0.4
Rectangular
√3
1
1
0.2
0.2
Probe Positioning with Respect to Phantom
6.7
Rectangular
√3
1
1
3.9
3.9
Post-processing
4.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
2.3
2.3
Test Sample Related
Test Sample Positioning
4.38 / 1.35
Normal
1
1
1
4.4
1.4
29
Device Holder Uncertainty
2.9 / 4.1
Normal
1
1
1
2.9
4.1
11
Power Drift of Measurement
5.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
2.9
2.9
Power Scaling
0.0
Rectangular
√3
1
1
0.0
0.0
Phantom and Setup
Phantom Uncertainty (Shape and Thickness
Tolerances)
7.6
Rectangular
√3
1
1
4.4
4.4
Liquid Conductivity ( Temperature Uncertainty)
3.24
Rectangular
√3
0.78
0.71
1.5
1.3
Liquid Conductivity (Measured)
2.88
Normal
1
0.78
0.71
2.2
2.0
43
Liquid Permittivity (Temperature Uncertainty)
1.13
Rectangular
√3
0.23
0.26
0.2
0.2
Liquid Permittivity (Measured)
2.50
Normal
1
0.23
0.26
0.6
0.7
54
Combined Standard Uncertainty
± 12.8 %
± 12.4 %
Expanded Uncertainty (K=2)
± 25.6 %
± 24.8 %
Body SAR Uncertainty Budget for Frequency Range of 3 GHz to 6 GHz
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Page No.
:
28 of 28
Report No. : SA171114C19
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
7. Information on the Testing Laboratories
We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our
best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved
according to ISO/IEC 17025.
If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:
Taiwan HwaYa EMC/RF/Safety/Telecom Lab:
Add: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil., Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel: 886-3-318-3232
Fax: 886-3-327-0892
Taiwan LinKo EMC/RF Lab:
Add: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Linkou Dist., New Taipei City 244, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel: 886-2-2605-2180
Fax: 886-2-2605-1924
Taiwan HsinChu EMC/RF Lab:
Add: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 30078, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel: 886-3-593-5343
Fax: 886-3-593-5342
Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com
Web Site: www.adt.com.tw
The road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.
---END---
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
Report No. : SA171114C19
Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification
The plots for system verification with largest deviation for each SAR system combination are shown as follows.
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/16
System Check_B2450_171216
DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B19T27N5_1216 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; σ = 1.997 S/m; εr = 51.334; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.4 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.67, 7.67, 7.67); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 18.7 W/kg
Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 97.81 V/m; Power Drift = -0.01 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 24.9 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 12.3 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 5.74 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 18.7 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
System Check_B5250_171212
DUT: Dipole 5 GHz; Type: D5GHzV2; SN: 1019
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 5250 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5250 MHz; σ = 5.475 S/m; εr = 47.871; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.7, 4.7, 4.7); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
Pin=100mW/Area Scan (91x91x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 15.1 W/kg
Pin=100mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4mm, dy=4mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 59.63 V/m; Power Drift = -0.01 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 31.5 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 7.94 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 2.25 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 16.5 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
System Check_B5600_171212
DUT: Dipole 5 GHz; Type: D5GHzV2; SN: 1019
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 5600 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5600 MHz; σ = 5.961 S/m; εr = 47.19; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.1, 4.1, 4.1); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
Pin=100mW/Area Scan (91x91x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 18.9 W/kg
Pin=100mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4mm, dy=4mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 67.16 V/m; Power Drift = -0.05 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 35.7 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 8.13 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 2.27 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 21.1 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
System Check_B5800_171212
DUT: Dipole 5 GHz; Type: D5GHzV2; SN: 1019
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 5800 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5800 MHz; σ = 6.254 S/m; εr = 46.801; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.22, 4.22, 4.22); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
Pin=100mW/Area Scan (91x91x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 18.4 W/kg
Pin=100mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4mm, dy=4mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 64.45 V/m; Power Drift = -0.08 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 35.8 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 7.77 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 2.17 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 20.5 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/21
System Check_B2450_171221
DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B19T27N5_1221 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; σ = 1.963 S/m; εr = 51.137; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.3 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7346; ConvF(7.68, 7.68, 7.68); Calibrated: 2017/10/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn679; Calibrated: 2017/07/31
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 19.2 W/kg
Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 97.09 V/m; Power Drift = 0.02 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 25.8 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 12.3 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 5.7 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 18.9 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
System Check_B5250_171212
DUT: Dipole 5 GHz; Type: D5GHzV2; SN: 1019
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 5250 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5250 MHz; σ = 5.475 S/m; εr = 47.871; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.7, 4.7, 4.7); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
Pin=100mW/Area Scan (91x91x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 15.1 W/kg
Pin=100mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4mm, dy=4mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 59.63 V/m; Power Drift = -0.01 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 31.5 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 7.94 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 2.25 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 16.5 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
System Check_B5600_171212
DUT: Dipole 5 GHz; Type: D5GHzV2; SN: 1019
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 5600 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5600 MHz; σ = 5.961 S/m; εr = 47.19; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.1, 4.1, 4.1); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
Pin=100mW/Area Scan (91x91x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 18.9 W/kg
Pin=100mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4mm, dy=4mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 67.16 V/m; Power Drift = -0.05 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 35.7 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 8.13 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 2.27 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 21.1 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
System Check_B5800_171212
DUT: Dipole 5 GHz; Type: D5GHzV2; SN: 1019
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 5800 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5800 MHz; σ = 6.254 S/m; εr = 46.801; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.22, 4.22, 4.22); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
Pin=100mW/Area Scan (91x91x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 18.4 W/kg
Pin=100mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4mm, dy=4mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 64.45 V/m; Power Drift = -0.08 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 35.8 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 7.77 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 2.17 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 20.5 W/kg
FCC SAR Test Report
Report Format Version 5.0.0
Issued Date
:
Dec. 22, 2017
Report No. : SA171114C19
Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement
The SAR plots for highest measured SAR in each exposure configuration, wireless mode and frequency band
combination, and measured SAR > 1.5 W/kg are shown as follows.
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
P01 2.4G WLAN_802.11b_Rear Face_0mm_Ch11
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2462 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B19T27N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 2462 MHz; σ = 2.034 S/m; εr = 52.078; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.8 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.3 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.67, 7.67, 7.67); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (91x191x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.275 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 11.47 V/m; Power Drift = 0.02 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.353 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.191 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.104 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.281 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
P02 5.3G WLAN_802.11n HT40_Rear Face_0mm_Ch54
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: WLAN_5G; Frequency: 5270 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5270 MHz; σ = 5.497 S/m; εr = 47.85; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.7, 4.7, 4.7); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (101x221x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.14 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (6x6x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 15.15 V/m; Power Drift = -0.03 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 2.36 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.679 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.263 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.46 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
P03 5.6G WLAN_802.11n HT40_Rear Face_0mm_Ch126
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: WLAN_5G; Frequency: 5630 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5630 MHz; σ = 5.989 S/m; εr = 47.082; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.1, 4.1, 4.1); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (101x221x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.32 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (6x6x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 16.13 V/m; Power Drift = -0.16 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 2.63 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.705 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.265 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.60 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
P04 5.8G WLAN_802.11n HT40_Rear Face_0mm_Ch151
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: WLAN_5G; Frequency: 5755 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5755 MHz; σ = 6.177 S/m; εr = 46.834; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.4 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.22, 4.22, 4.22); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (101x221x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.68 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (6x6x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 17.68 V/m; Power Drift = -0.12 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 3.28 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.862 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.333 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.94 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/16
P05 BT_Rear Face_0mm_Ch39
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2441 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B19T27N5_1216 Medium parameters used: f = 2441 MHz; σ = 1.987 S/m; εr = 51.352; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.4 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.67, 7.67, 7.67); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (91x191x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0213 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 2.967 V/m; Power Drift = 0.16 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0270 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.012 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.00638 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0192 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
P06 2.4G WLAN_802.11b_Left Side_0mm_Ch11
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2462 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B19T27N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 2462 MHz; σ = 2.034 S/m; εr = 52.078; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.8 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.3 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.67, 7.67, 7.67); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (91x191x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.785 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 16.71 V/m; Power Drift = 0.08 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.41 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.666 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.313 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.10 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
P07 5.3G WLAN_802.11n HT40_Rear Face_0mm_Ch54
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: WLAN_5G; Frequency: 5270 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5270 MHz; σ = 5.497 S/m; εr = 47.85; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.7, 4.7, 4.7); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (101x221x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.14 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (6x6x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 15.15 V/m; Power Drift = -0.03 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 2.36 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.679 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.263 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.46 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
P08 5.6G WLAN_802.11n HT40_Rear Face_0mm_Ch126
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: WLAN_5G; Frequency: 5630 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5630 MHz; σ = 5.989 S/m; εr = 47.082; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.0 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.1, 4.1, 4.1); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (101x221x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.32 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (6x6x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 16.13 V/m; Power Drift = -0.16 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 2.63 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.705 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.265 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.60 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/12
P09 5.8G WLAN_802.11n HT40_Rear Face_0mm_Ch151
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: WLAN_5G; Frequency: 5755 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B34T60N1_1212 Medium parameters used: f = 5755 MHz; σ = 6.177 S/m; εr = 46.834; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.6 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.4 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(4.22, 4.22, 4.22); Calibrated: 2017/03/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn861; Calibrated: 2017/05/22
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (101x221x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.000 mm, dy=1.000 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.68 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (6x6x12)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=2mm
Reference Value = 17.68 V/m; Power Drift = -0.12 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 3.28 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.862 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.333 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.94 W/kg
Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2017/12/2
P1 BT_Left Side_0mm_Ch39
DUT: 171114C19
Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2441 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: B19T27N5_1221 Medium parameters used: f = 2441 MHz; σ = 1.987 S/m; εr = 51.352; ρ =
1000 kg/m3
Ambient Temperature:23.8 ℃ ; Liquid Temperature:23.3 ℃
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7346; ConvF(7.68, 7.68, 7.68); Calibrated: 2017/10/24;
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn679; Calibrated: 2017/07/31
- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40;
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)
- Area Scan (91x191x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0863 W/kg
- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 4.804 V/m; Power Drift = 0.10 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0730 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.033 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.014 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0565 W/kg
Download: V200CP Point of Sale Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report VeriFone Inc
Mirror Download [FCC.gov]V200CP Point of Sale Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report VeriFone Inc
Document ID3703772
Application IDp7wiOFGavtlMokoUd7pPow==
Document DescriptionSAR Report
Short Term ConfidentialNo
Permanent ConfidentialNo
SupercedeNo
Document TypeRF Exposure Info
Display FormatAdobe Acrobat PDF - pdf
Filesize131.55kB (1644354 bits)
Date Submitted2018-01-05 00:00:00
Date Available2018-01-05 00:00:00
Creation Date2017-12-22 17:10:56
Producing SoftwareMicrosoft® Office Word 2007
Document Lastmod2017-12-28 17:20:41
Document TitleSAR Report
Document CreatorMicrosoft® Office Word 2007

Source Exif Data [exif.tools]:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.6
Linearized                      : No
Encryption                      : Standard V2.3 (128-bit)
User Access                     : Extract
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 4.0-c316 44.253921, Sun Oct 01 2006 17:14:39
Create Date                     : 2017:12:22 17:10:56+08:00
Creator Tool                    : Microsoft® Office Word 2007
Modify Date                     : 2017:12:28 17:20:41+08:00
Metadata Date                   : 2017:12:28 17:20:41+08:00
Producer                        : Microsoft® Office Word 2007
Format                          : application/pdf
Document ID                     : uuid:3db98888-5c90-4b9e-8989-83e3a7c57af8
Instance ID                     : uuid:b82e5e37-290a-45ca-af2c-3c6082abb653
Has XFA                         : No
Page Count                      : 48
Language                        : zh-TW
Creator                         : Microsoft® Office Word 2007