GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED 4G Wireless Data Terminal

Page 1 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 2 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 3 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 4 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 5 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 6 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 7 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 8 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 9 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 10 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 11 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 12 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 13 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 14 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 15 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 16 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 17 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 18 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 19 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 20 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 21 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 22 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 23 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 24 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 25 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 26 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 27 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 28 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 29 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 30 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 31 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 32 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 33 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 34 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 35 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 36 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 37 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 38 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 39 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 40 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 41 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 42 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 43 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 44 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 45 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 46 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 47 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 48 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 49 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 50 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 51 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Page 52 of GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

SAR EVALUATION REPORT
For
HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK
TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Suite 603, 6/F, Laws Commercial Plaza, 788 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Kowloon Hong Kong
FCC ID: 2AC88-GLMG18A01
Report Type:
Product Type:
Original Report
4G Wireless Data Terminal
Report Number:
Report Date:
RXZ181012004-23
2018-11-29
Jerry Chang
Reviewed By:
Prepared By:
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp.(Taiwan)
70, Lane 169, Sec. 2, Datong Road, Xizhi Dist.,
New Taipei City 22183, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel: +886 (2)2647 6898 Fax: +886 (2) 2647 6895
www.bacl.com.tw
Note: This test report is prepared for the customer shown above and for the device described herein. It may not be duplicated or
used in part without prior written consent from Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp.
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Attestation of Test Results
EUT Description
Tested Model
EUT
Information
FCC ID
Serial Number
Test Date
MODE
LTE Band 40
(2305-2315MH)
4G Wireless Data Terminal
GLMU18A01
2AC88-GLMU18A01
18052300620
2018-10-17 ~ 2018-10-18
Max. SAR Level(s) Reported(W/kg)
1g Head SAR
0.119
1g Body SAR
1.086
Limit
1.6
FCC 47 CFR part 2.1093
Radiofrequency radiation exposure evaluation: portable devices
IEEE1528:2013
IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific
Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices:
Measurement Techniques
Applicable
Standards
IEC 62209-2:2010
Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless
communication devices-Human models, instrumentation, and procedures-Part 2: Procedure
to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for wireless communication devices used in
close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz)
KDB procedures
KDB 447498 D01 General RF Exposure Guidance v06
KDB 865664 D01 SAR Measurement 100 MHz to 6 GHz v01r04
KDB 865664 D02 RF Exposure Reporting v01r02
KDB 941225 D01 3G SAR Procedures v03r01
KDB 941225 D05 SAR for LTE Devices v02r05
KDB 941225 D06 Hotspot Mode v02r01
Note: This wireless device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR)
for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure limits specified in FCC 47 CFR part 2.1093 and has been tested in
accordance with the measurement procedures specified in IEEE 1528-2013 and RF exposure KDB procedures.
The results and statements contained in this report pertain only to the device(s) evaluated.
Note: For test data of GSM/WCDMA/LTE Band(other bands) , please refer to report: RDG181012004-20, issued
by Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan).
SAR Evaluation Report
2 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY ......................................................................................................................... 4
EUT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................................... 5
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ......................................................................................................................................... 5
REFERENCE, STANDARDS, AND GUIDELINES.................................................................................................. 6
SAR LIMITS ................................................................................................................................................................. 7
FACILITIES .................................................................................................................................................................. 8
DESCRIPTION OF TEST SYSTEM .......................................................................................................................... 9
RECOMMENDED TISSUE DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS FOR HEAD AND BODY .................................... 13
EQUIPMENT LIST AND CALIBRATION ............................................................................................................. 14
EQUIPMENTS LIST & CALIBRATION INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 14
SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION .............................................................................................. 15
LIQUID VERIFICATION ............................................................................................................................................... 15
SYSTEM ACCURACY VERIFICATION ........................................................................................................................... 16
SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION DATA ..................................................................................................................... 17
EUT TEST STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 19
TEST POSITIONS FOR DEVICE OPERATING NEXT TO A PERSON’S EAR........................................................................ 19
CHEEK/TOUCH POSITION ........................................................................................................................................... 20
EAR/TILT POSITION ................................................................................................................................................... 20
TEST POSITIONS FOR BODY-WORN AND OTHER CONFIGURATIONS .............................................................................. 21
TEST DISTANCE FOR SAR EVALUATION .................................................................................................................... 21
SAR EVALUATION PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................. 22
CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT ........................................................................................... 23
PROVISION APPLICABLE ............................................................................................................................................ 23
TEST PROCEDURE ...................................................................................................................................................... 23
RADIO CONFIGURATION ............................................................................................................................................ 23
MAXIMUM TARGET OUTPUT POWER ......................................................................................................................... 25
TEST RESULTS: .......................................................................................................................................................... 26
STANDALONE SAR TEST EXCLUSION CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................... 27
ANTENNA DISTANCE TO EDGE .................................................................................................................................. 27
SAR TEST EXCLUSION FOR THE EUT EDGE CONSIDERATIONS RESULT ...................................................................... 28
SAR MEASUREMENT RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 29
SAR TEST DATA ........................................................................................................................................................ 29
SAR MEASUREMENT VARIABILITY .................................................................................................................. 31
SAR PLOTS ................................................................................................................................................................. 32
APPENDIX A MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ............................................................................................... 49
APPENDIX B EUT TEST POSITION PHOTOS .................................................................................................... 51
APPENDIX C CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES .................................................................................................. 52
SAR Evaluation Report
3 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY
Revision Number
Report Number
Description of Revision
Date of Revision
1.0
RXZ181012004-23
Original Report
2018-11-29
SAR Evaluation Report
4 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
EUT DESCRIPTION
This report has been prepared on behalf of HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY
LIMITED and their product 4G Wireless Data Terminal, Model: GLMG18A01, FCC ID:
2AC88-GLMG18A01 or the EUT (Equipment under Test) as referred to in the rest of this report.
*All measurement and test data in this report was gathered from production sample serial number: 18101200420
(Assigned by BACL, Dongguan).The EUT supplied by the applicant was received on 2018-10-12.
Technical Specification
Device Type:
Exposure Category:
Antenna Type(s):
DTM Type:
Multi-slot Class:
Portable
Population / Uncontrolled
Internal Antenna
Class B
GPRS(Class 12); EGPRS(Class 12)
Body-Worn Accessories:
None
Face-Head Accessories:
None
Operation Mode :
TDD-LTE,
Frequency Band:
LTE Band 40:2305-2315& 2350-2360 MHz(TX)
Conducted RF Power:
LTE Band 40(2305-2315MHz): 21.77 dBm,
Dimensions (L*W*H):
Length (136 mm)*Width (72.2 mm)*High (12 mm)
Power Source:
Normal Operation:
3.85 VDC Rechargeable Battery
Head and Body Worn
Note: For test data of GSM/WCDMA/LTE Band(other bands) , please refer to report: RDG181012004-20, issued
by Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan).
SAR Evaluation Report
5 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
REFERENCE, STANDARDS, AND GUIDELINES
FCC:
The Report and Order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable
transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g
as recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1-1992 [6] for an uncontrolled environment (Paragraph
65). According to the Supplement C of OET Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for
Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the
device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case”
conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak
performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling.
This report describes the methodology and results of experiments performed on wireless data terminal. The
objective was to determine if there is RF radiation and if radiation is found, what is the extent of radiation
with respect to safety limits. SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) is the measure of RF exposure determined by
the amount of RF energy absorbed by human body (or its parts) – to determine how the RF energy couples
to the body or head which is a primary health concern for body worn devices. The limit below which the
exposure to RF is considered safe by regulatory bodies in North America is 1.6 mW/g average over 1 gram
of tissue mass.
CE:
The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices,
including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 2 mW/g as recommended by
EN62209-1 for an uncontrolled environment. According to the Standard, the device should be evaluated at
maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended
use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions
for maximum RF energy coupling.
This report describes the methodology and results of experiments performed on wireless data terminal. The
objective was to determine if there is RF radiation and if radiation is found, what is the extent of radiation
with respect to safety limits. SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) is the measure of RF exposure determined by
the amount of RF energy absorbed by human body (or its parts) – to determine how the RF energy couples
to the body or head which is a primary health concern for body worn devices. The limit below which the
exposure to RF is considered safe by regulatory bodies in Europe is 2 mW/g average over 10 gram of tissue
mass.
The test configurations were laid out on a specially designed test fixture to ensure the reproducibility of
measurements. Each configuration was scanned for SAR. Analysis of each scan was carried out to
characterize the above effects in the device.
SAR Evaluation Report
6 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
SAR Limits
FCC Limit
SAR (W/kg)
(General Population /
Uncontrolled Exposure
Environment)
(Occupational /
Controlled Exposure
Environment)
Spatial Average
(averaged over the whole body)
0.08
0.4
Spatial Peak
(averaged over any 1 g of tissue)
1.60
8.0
Spatial Peak
(hands/wrists/feet/ankles
averaged over 10 g)
4.0
20.0
EXPOSURE LIMITS
CE Limit
SAR (W/kg)
EXPOSURE LIMITS
Spatial Average
(averaged over the whole body)
Spatial Peak
(averaged over any 10 g of
tissue)
Spatial Peak
(hands/wrists/feet/ankles
averaged over 10 g)
(General Population /
Uncontrolled Exposure
Environment)
(Occupational /
Controlled Exposure
Environment)
0.08
0.4
2.0
10
4.0
20.0
Population/Uncontrolled Environments are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individual
who have no knowledge or control of their exposure.
Occupational/Controlled Environments are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be
incurred by people who are aware of the potential for exposure (i.e. as a result of employment or
occupation).
General Population/Uncontrolled environments Spatial Peak limit 1.6W/kg (FCC) & 2 W/kg (CE) applied
to the EUT.
SAR Evaluation Report
7 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
FACILITIES
The test site used by Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan) to collect test data is located
on
70, Lane 169, Sec. 2, Datong Road, Xizhi Dist., New Taipei City 22183, Taiwan, R.O.C.
68-3, Lane 169, Sec. 2, Datong Road, Xizhi Dist., New Taipei City 22183, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Test site at Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan) has been fully described in reports
submitted to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). The details of these reports have been found
to be in compliance with the requirements of Section 2.948 of the FCC Rules on April 22, 2015. The
facility also complies with the radiated and AC line conducted test site criteria set forth in ANSI
C63.4-2014.
The Federal Communications Commission has the reports on file and is listed under FCC Registration No.:
974454. The test site has been approved by the FCC for public use and is listed in the FCC Public Access
Link (PAL) database.
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan) Lab is accredited to ISO 17025 by Taiwan
Accreditation Foundation (TAF code: 3180), Please refer Exhibit E “Certificate and Scope of Accreditation
of ISO/IEC 17025:2005 TAF Certificate”
SAR Evaluation Report
8 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
DESCRIPTION OF TEST SYSTEM
These measurements were performed with the automated near-field scanning system DASY6 from Schmid
& Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG) which is the Fifth generation of the system shown in the figure
hereinafter:
DASY6 System Description
The DASY6 system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items:
SAR Evaluation Report
9 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)









Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
A standard high precision 6-axis robot (Staubli TX=RX family) with controller, teach pendant and
software. An arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE).
An isotropic field probe optimized and calibrated for the targeted measurement.
A data acquisition electronics (DAE) which performs the signal application, signal multiplexing,
AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is
battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC.
The Electro-optical converter (EOC) performs the conversion from optical to electrical signals for the
digital communication to the DAE. To use optical surface detection, a special version of the EOC is
required. The EOC signal is transmitted to the measurement server.
The function of the measurement server is to perform the time critical tasks such as signal filtering,
control of the robot operation and fast movement interrupts.
The Light Beam used is for probe alignment. This improves the (absolute) accuracy of the probe
positioning.
A computer running Win7 professional operating system and the DASY52 software.
Remote control and teach pendant as well as additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning
lamps, etc.
The phantom, the device holder and other accessories according to
the targeted measurement.
DASY6 Measurement Server
The DASY6 measurement server is based on a PC/104 CPU board with
a 400 MHz intel ULV Celeron, 128 MB chip-disk and 128 MB RAM.
The necessary circuits for communication with the DAE4 (or DAE3)
electronics box, as well as the 16-bit AD converter system for optical
detection and digital I/O interface are contained on the DASY6 I/O
board, which is directly connected to the PC/104 bus of the CPU board.
The measurement server performs all real-time data evaluations of field measurements and surface detection, controls robot movements, and handles safety operations. The PC operating system cannot interfere
with these time-critical processes. All connections are supervised by a watchdog, and disconnection of any
of the cables to the measurement server will automatically disarm the robot and disable all programcontrolled robot movements. Furthermore, the measurement server is equipped with an expansion port,
which is reserved for future applications. Please note that this expansion port does not have a standard- ized
pinout, and therefore only devices provided by SPEAG can be connected. Connection of devices from any
other supplier could seriously damage the measurement server.
Data Acquisition Electronics
The data acquisition electronics (DAE4) consist of a highly sensitive electrometer-grade preamplifier with
auto-zeroing, a channel and gain-switching multiplexer, a fast 16 bit AD-converter and a command decoder
with a control logic unit. Transmission to the measurement server is accomplished through an optical
downlink for data and status information, as well as an optical uplink for commands and the clock.
The mechanical probe mounting device includes two different sensor systems for frontal and sideways
probe contacts. They are used for mechanical surface detection and probe collision detection.
The input impedance of both the DAE4 as well as of the DAE3 box is 200MOhm; the inputs are
symmetrical and floating. Common mode rejection is above 80 dB.
SAR Evaluation Report
10 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
EX3DV4 E-Field Probes
Frequency
10 MHz to > 6 GHz
Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (30 MHz to 6 GHz)
Directivity
± 0.3 dB in TSL (rotation around probe axis)
± 0.5 dB in TSL (rotation normal to probe axis)
Dynamic
Range
10 µW/g to > 100 mW/g
Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (noise: typically < 1 µW/g)
Dimensions
Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm)
Tip diameter: 2.5 mm (Body: 12 mm)
Typical distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1 mm
Application
High precision dosimetric measurements in any exposure scenario
(e.g., very strong gradient fields); the only probe that enables
compliance testing for frequencies up to 6 GHz with precision of
better 30%.
Compatibility
DASY3, DASY4, DASY52 SAR and higher, EASY4/MRI
SAM Twin Phantom
The SAM Twin Phantom (shown in front of DASY6) is a fiberglass shell
phantom with shell thickness 2 mm, except in the ear region where the
thickness is increased to 6 mm. The phantom has three mea- surement
areas: 1) Left Head, 2) Right Head, and 3) Flat Section. For larger devices, the use of the ELI-Phantom (shown behind DASY6) is required.
For devices such as glasses with a wireless link, the Face Down Phantom
is the most suitable (between the SAM Twin and ELI phan- toms).
When the phantom is mounted inside allocated slot of the DASY6
platform, phanotm reference points can be taught directly in the DASY5
V5.2software. When the DASY6 platform is used to mount the
phantom, some of the phantom teaching points cannot be reached by the
robot in DASY5 V5.2. A special tool called P1a-P2aX-Former is
provided to transform two of the three points, P1 and P2, to reachable
locations. To use these new teaching points, a revised phantom configuration file is required.
In addition to our standard broadband liquids, the phantom can be used with the following tissue simulating liquids:
Sugar-water-based liquids can be left permanently in the phantom. Always cover the liquid when the
system is not in use to prevent changes in liquid parameters due to water evaporation.
DGBE-based liquids should be used with care. As DGBE is a softener for most plastics, the liquid should
be taken out of the phantom, and the phantom should be dried when the system is not in use (desirable at
least once a week).
•Do not use other organic solvents without previously testing the solvent resistivity of the phantom.
Approximately 25 liters of liquid is required to fill the SAM Twin phantom.
SAR Evaluation Report
11 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Tissue Dielectric Parameters for Head and Body Phantoms
The head tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 in P1528 have been
incorporated in the following table. These head parameters are derived from planar layer models simulating
the highest expected SAR for the dielectric properties and tissue thickness variations in a human head.
Other head and body tissue parameters that have not been specified in P1528 are derived from the tissue
dielectric parameters computed from the 4-Cole-Cole equations described in Reference [12] and
extrapolated according to the head parameters specified in P1528.
Robots
The DASY6 system uses the high-precision industrial robots TX60L, TX90XL, and RX160L from St aubli
SA (France). The TX robot family - the successor of the well-known RX robot family - continues to
offer the features important for DASY6 applications:





High precision (repeatability 0.02mm)
High reliability (industrial design)
Low maintenance costs (virtually maintenance free due to direct drive gears; no belt drives)
Jerk-free straight movements (brushless synchrony motors; no stepper motors)
Low ELF interference (motor control fields shielded via the closed metallic construction shields)
The robots are controlled by the Staubli CS8c robot controllers. All information regarding the use and
maintenance of the robot arm and the robot controller is provided
Area Scans
Area scans are defined prior to the measurement process being executed with a user defined variable
spacing between each measurement point (integral) allowing low uncertainty measurements to be
conducted. Scans defined for FCC applications utilize a 15mm 2 step integral, with 1.5mm interpolation
used to locate the peak SAR area used for zoom scan assessments.
Where the system identifies multiple SAR peaks (which are within 25% of peak value) the system will
provide the user with the option of assessing each peak location individually for zoom scan averaging.
Zoom Scan (Cube Scan Averaging)
The averaging zoom scan volume utilized in the DASY4 software is in the shape of a cube and the side
dimension of a 1 g or 10 g mass is dependent on the density of the liquid representing the simulated tissue.
A density of 1000 kg/m3 is used to represent the head and body tissue density and not the phantom liquid
density, in order to be consistent with the definition of the liquid dielectric properties, i.e. the side length of
the 1g cube is 10mm,with the side length of the 10g cube is 21.5mm.
When the cube intersects with the surface of the phantom, it is oriented so that 3 vertices touch the surface
of the shell or the center of a face is tangent to the surface. The face of the cube closest to the surface is
modified in order to conform to the tangent surface.
The zoom scan integer steps can be user defined so as to reduce uncertainty, but normal practice for typical
test applications (including FCC) utilize a physical step of 7 x7 x 7 (5mmx5mmx5mm) providing a volume
of 30 mm in the X & Y & Z axis.
SAR Evaluation Report
12 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Recommended Tissue Dielectric Parameters for Head and Body
Head Tissue
Body Tissue
Frequency
(MHz)
εr
Ơ (S/m)
εr
Ơ (S/m)
150
52.3
0.76
61.9
0.80
300
45.3
0.87
58.2
0.92
450
43.5
0.87
56.7
0.94
835
41.5
0.90
55.2
0.97
900
41.5
0.97
55.0
1.05
915
41.5
0.98
55.0
1.06
1450
40.5
1.20
54.0
1.30
1610
40.3
1.29
53.8
1.40
1800-2000
40.0
1.40
53.3
1.52
2450
39.2
1.80
52.7
1.95
3000
38.5
2.40
52.0
2.73
5800
35.3
5.27
48.2
6.00
Tissue Dielectric Parameters for Head and Body Phantoms
The head tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 in P1528 have been
incorporated in the following table. These head parameters are derived from planar layer models simulating
the highest expected SAR for the dielectric properties and tissue thickness variations in a human head.
Other head and body tissue parameters that have not been specified in P1528 are derived from the tissue
dielectric parameters computed from the 4-Cole-Cole equations described in Reference [12] and
extrapolated according to the head parameters specified in P1528.
SAR Evaluation Report
13 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
EQUIPMENT LIST AND CALIBRATION
Equipments List & Calibration Information
Equipment
Model
S/N
Calibration
Calibration
Date
Due Date
Robot
TX90
5N26A1
NCR
NCR
DASY5 Test Software
DASY5.2
N/A
NCR
NCR
DASY6 Measurement Server
DASY 6
1588
N/A
N/A
Data Acquisition Electronics
DAE4
527
2018/8/14
2019/8/13
E-Field Probe
EX3DV4
7382
2018/8/10
2019/8/9
Dipole,2300MHz
D2300V2
1085
2018/5/9
2021/5/7
Wideband Radio Communcation Tester
CMW500
149170
2018/5/11
2019/5/10
Mounting Device
N/A
SD 000 H01 KA
N/A
N/A
Twin SAM
Twin SAM V5.0
1368
N/A
N/A
Twin SAM
Twin SAM V8.0
1953
N/A
N/A
Simulated Tissue 2300 MHz Head
TS-2600-H
Each Time
Simulated Tissue 2300 MHz Body
TS-2600-B
Each Time
Network Analyzer
8753D
3410A05361
2018/3/22
2019/3/21
Signal Generator
8648C
3623A02870
2018/5/18
2019/5/17
Power Meter
E4418B
US39402167
2018/5/17
2019/5/16
Power Sensor
E9300A
US39210953
2018/5/17
2019/5/16
Power Amplifier
ZHL-42W+
329401642
2018/1/11
2019/1/10
Directional Coupler
488Z
N/A
N/A
N/A
Attenuator
20dB, 100W
N/A
N/A
N/A
Attenuator
3dB, 150W
N/A
N/A
N/A
SAR Evaluation Report
14 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION
Liquid Verification
Liquid Verification Setup Block Diagram
Liquid Verification Results
Frequency
(MHz)
Liquid Type
2300
2310
Head Tissue Head
Head Tissue Head
Liquid
Parameter
Ơ
(S/m)
1.693
1.705
Target Value
Delta
(%)
εr
Ơ (S/m)
εr
Ơ (S/m)
Δεr
41.275
41.236
1.67
1.67
39.50
39.50
1.38
2.10
4.49
4.39
Tolerance
(%)
±5
±5
*Liquid Verification above was performed on 2018-10-17
Frequency
(MHz)
Liquid Type
2300
2310
Head Tissue Body
Head Tissue Body
Liquid
Parameter
Ơ
(S/m)
1.824
1.836
Target Value
Delta
(%)
εr
Ơ (S/m)
εr
Ơ (S/m)
Δεr
53.123
53.082
1.81
1.81
52.90
52.90
0.77
1.44
0.42
0.34
Tolerance
(%)
±5
±5
*Liquid Verification above was performed on 2018-10-18
SAR Evaluation Report
15 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
System Accuracy Verification
Prior to the assessment, the system validation kit was used to test whether the system was operating within
its specifications of ±10%. The validation results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot
is attached as well in the SAR plots files.
The spacing distances in the System Verification Setup Block Diagram is given by the following:
a)
s = 15 mm ± 0,2 mm for 300 MHz ≤ f ≤ 1 000 MHz;
b) s = 10 mm ± 0,2 mm for 1 000 MHz < f ≤ 3 000 MHz;
c)
s = 10 mm ± 0,2 mm for 3 000 MHz < f ≤ 6 000 MHz.
System Verification Setup Block Diagram
System Accuracy Check Results
Date
Frequency
Band
Liquid
Type
Input
Power
(mW)
Measured
SAR
(W/kg)
2018/10/17
2300 MHz
Head
250
1g
2018/10/18
2300 MHz
Body
250
1g
Normalized
to 1W
(W/kg)
Target
Value(W/kg)
Delta
(%)
Tolerance
(%)
12.70
50.80
49.40
2.83
±10
12.40
49.60
47.30
4.86
±10
*The SAR values above are normalized to 1 Watt forward power.
SAR Evaluation Report
16 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION DATA
System Check_Head_2300MHz
DUT: D2300V2-1085
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2300 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: HSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2300 MHz; σ = 1.693 S/m; εr = 41.275; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(8.26, 8.26, 8.26); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Pin=250mW/Area Scan (61x61x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 21.0 W/kg
Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 109.4 V/m; Power Drift = -0.07 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 25.6 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 12.7 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 6.17 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 20.9 W/kg
0 dB = 20.9 W/kg = 13.20 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
17 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
System Check_Body_2300MHz
DUT: D2300V2-1085
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2300 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2300 MHz; σ = 1.824 S/m; εr = 53.123; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Pin=250mW/Area Scan (61x61x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 20.1 W/kg
Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 103.0 V/m; Power Drift = -0.02 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 24.5 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 12.4 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 6.01 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 20.1 W/kg
0 dB = 20.1 W/kg = 13.03 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
18 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
EUT TEST STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY
Test Positions for Device Operating Next to a Person’s Ear
This category includes most wireless handsets with fixed, retractable or internal antennas located toward
the top half of the device, with or without a foldout, sliding or similar keypad cover. The handset should
have its earpiece located within the upper ¼ of the device, either along the centerline or off-centered, as
perceived by its users. This type of handset should be positioned in a normal operating position with the
“test device reference point” located along the “vertical centerline” on the front of the device aligned to the
“ear reference point”. The “test device reference point” should be located at the same level as the center
of the earpiece region. The “vertical centerline” should bisect the front surface of the handset at its top
and bottom edges. A “ear reference point” is located on the outer surface of the head phantom on each ear
spacer. It is located 1.5 cm above the center of the ear canal entrance in the “phantom reference plane”
defined by the three lines joining the center of each “ear reference point” (left and right) and the tip of the
mouth.
A handset should be initially positioned with the earpiece region pressed against the ear spacer of a head
phantom. For the SCC-34/SC-2 head phantom, the device should be positioned parallel to the “N-F” line
defined along the base of the ear spacer that contains the “ear reference point”. For interim head
phantoms, the device should be positioned parallel to the cheek for maximum RF energy coupling. The
“test device reference point” is aligned to the “ear reference point” on the head phantom and the “vertical
centerline” is aligned to the “phantom reference plane”. This is called the “initial ear position”. While
maintaining these three alignments, the body of the handset is gradually adjusted to each of the following
positions for evaluating SAR:
LE ER
15
mm
EE
ERP - ear reference
i t- entrance to ear
EEP
SAR Evaluation Report
19 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Cheek/Touch Position
The device is brought toward the mouth of the head phantom by pivoting against the “ear reference point”
or along the “N-F” line for the SCC-34/SC-2 head phantom.
This test position is established:
When any point on the display, keypad or mouthpiece portions of the handset is in contact
with the phantom.
(or) When any portion of a foldout, sliding or similar keypad cover opened to its intended
self-adjusting normal use position is in contact with the cheek or mouth of the phantom.
For existing head phantoms – when the handset loses contact with the phantom at the pivoting point,
rotation should continue until the device touches the cheek of the phantom or breaks its last contact
from the ear spacer.
Cheek /Touch Position
Ear/Tilt Position
With the handset aligned in the “Cheek/Touch Position”:
1) If the earpiece of the handset is not in full contact with the phantom’s ear spacer (in the “Cheek/Touch
position”) and the peak SAR location for the “Cheek/Touch” position is located at the ear spacer region or
corresponds to the earpiece region of the handset, the device should be returned to the “initial ear position”
by rotating it away from the mouth until the earpiece is in full contact with the ear spacer.
2) (otherwise) The handset should be moved (translated) away from the cheek perpendicular to the line
passes through both “ear reference points” (note: one of these ear reference points may not physically exist
on a split head model) for approximate 2-3 cm. While it is in this position, the device handset is tilted away
from the mouth with respect to the “test device reference point” until the inside angle between the vertical
centerline on the front surface of the phone and the horizontal line passing through the ear reference point is
by 15 80°. After the tilt, it is then moved (translated) back toward the head perpendicular to the line passes
through both “ear reference points” until the device touches the phantom or the ear spacer. If the antenna
touches the head first, the positioning process should be repeated with a tilt angle less than 15° so that the
device and its antenna would touch the phantom simultaneously. This test position may require a device
holder or positioner to achieve the translation and tilting with acceptable positioning repeatability.
If a device is also designed to transmit with its keypad cover closed for operating in the head position, such
positions should also be considered in the SAR evaluation. The device should be tested on the left and right
side of the head phantom in the “Cheek/Touch” and “Ear/Tilt” positions. When applicable, each
configuration should be tested with the antenna in its fully extended and fully retracted positions. These test
configurations should be tested at the high, middle and low frequency channels of each operating mode; for
example, AMPS, CDMA, and TDMA. If the SAR measured at the middle channel for each test
configuration (left, right, Cheek/Touch, Tilt/Ear, extended and retracted) is at least 2.0 dB lower than the
SAR limit, testing at the high and low channels is optional for such test configuration(s). If the transmission
band of the test device is less than 10 MHz, testing at the high and low frequency channels is optional.
SAR Evaluation Report
20 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Ear /Tilt 15o Position
Test positions for body-worn and other configurations
Body-worn operating configurations should be tested with the belt-clips and holsters attached to the device
and positioned against a flat phantom in normal use configurations. Devices with a headset output should
be tested with a headset connected to the device. When multiple accessories that do not contain metallic
components are supplied with the device, the device may be tested with only the accessory that dictates the
closest spacing to the body. When multiple accessories that contain metallic components are supplied with
the device, the device must be tested with each accessory that contains a unique metallic component. If
multiple accessories share an identical metallic component (e.g., the same metallic belt-clip used with
different holsters with no other metallic components), only the accessory that dictates the closest spacing to
the body must be tested.
Body-worn accessories may not always be supplied or available as options for some devices that are
intended to be authorized for body-worn use. A separation distance of 1.5 cm between the back of the
device and a flat phantom is recommended for testing body-worn SAR compliance under such
circumstances. Other separation distances may be used, but they should not exceed 2.5 cm. In these cases,
the device may use body-worn accessories that provide a separation distance greater than that tested for the
device provided however that the accessory contains no metallic components.
Test Distance for SAR Evaluation
In this case the EUT(Equipment Under Test) is set 10mm away from the phantom, the test distance is
10mm.
SAR Evaluation Report
21 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
SAR Evaluation Procedure
The evaluation was performed with the following procedure:
Step 1: Measurement of the SAR value at a fixed location above the ear point or central position was
used as a reference value for assessing the power drop. The SAR at this point is measured at the start
of the test and then again at the end of the testing.
Step 2: The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head was measured at a distance of 4 mm
from the inner surface of the shell. The area covered the entire dimension of the head or radiating
structures of the EUT, the horizontal grid spacing was 15 mm x 15 mm, and the SAR distribution was
determined by integrated grid of 1.5mm x 1.5mm. Based on these data, the area of the maximum
absorption was determined by spline interpolation. The first Area Scan covers the entire dimension of
the EUT to ensure that the hotspot was correctly identified.
Step 3: Around this point, a volume of 30 mm x 30 mm x 30 mm was assessed by measuring 7x 7 x 7
points. On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated under the following
procedure:
1) The data at the surface were extrapolated, since the center of the dipoles is 1.2 mm away
from the tip of the probe and the distance between the surface and the lowest measuring point is
1.3 mm. The extrapolation was based on a least square algorithm. A polynomial of the fourth
order was calculated through the points in z-axes. This polynomial was then used to evaluate the
points between the surface and the probe tip.
2) The maximum interpolated value was searched with a straightforward algorithm. Around this
maximum the SAR values averaged over the spatial volumes (1 g or 10 g) were computed by the
3D-Spline interpolation algorithm. The 3D-Spline is composed of three one dimensional splines
with the “Not a knot"-condition (in x, y and z-directions). The volume was integrated with the
trapezoidal-algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were interpolated to calculate the
averages.
All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher average
value was found.
Step 4: Re-measurement of the SAR value at the same location as in Step 1. If the value changed by
more than 5%, the evaluation was repeated.
SAR Evaluation Report
22 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT
Provision Applicable
The measured peak output power should be greater and within 5% than EMI measurement.
Test Procedure
The RF output of the transmitter was connected to the input of the EMI Test Receiver through sufficient
attenuation.
EUT
Combiner
EMI Test
Receiver
Wireless Communication Test
Set
(CMW500)
LTE
Radio Configuration
The power measurement was configured by the Wireless Communication Test Set.
SAR Evaluation Report
23 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
TDD-LTE
SAR Evaluation Report
24 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Maximum Target Output Power
Max Target Power(dBm)
Mode/Band
LTE Band 40
SAR Evaluation Report
Channel
Low
Middle
High
22.0
22.0
22.0
25 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Results:
LTE Band 40(2305-2315MHz):
Test
Test
Bandwidth
Modulation
QPSK
5M
16-QAM
QPSK
10M
16-QAM
Note:
Resource
Block &
RB offset
RB1#0
RB1#13
RB1#24
RB15#0
RB15#10
RB25#0
RB1#0
RB1#13
RB1#24
RB15#0
RB15#10
RB25#0
RB1#0
RB1#25
RB1#49
RB25#0
RB25#25
RB50#0
RB1#0
RB1#25
RB1#49
RB25#0
RB25#25
RB50#0
Target
MPR
Meas
MPR
Low
Middle
High
Channel
Channel
Channel
(dBm)
21.53
21.6
21.73
20.71
20.86
20.81
20.73
20.14
20.72
19.87
19.79
19.79
(dBm)
21.46
21.56
21.59
20.87
20.56
20.67
20.58
20.15
20.62
19.83
19.83
19.69
21.77
21.68
21.67
21.67
21.74
21.62
20.86
20.69
20.64
20.03
19.93
19.71
(dBm)
21.7
21.53
21.67
20.79
20.68
20.86
20.68
20.08
20.73
19.79
19.91
19.74
1. SAR for LTE band exposure configurations is measured according to the procedures of KDB 941225 D05
SAR for LTE Devices v02.
2. KDB941225D05- Start with the largest channel bandwidth and measure SAR for QPSK with 1 RB
allocation, using the RB offset and required test channel combination with the highest maximum output
power among RB offset the upper edge, middle and lower edge of each required test channel.
3. When the 1-g SAR is ≤ 0.8W/kg, testing for other channels are optional.
4. Worst case SAR for 50% RB allocation is selected to be tested.
5.KDB941225D05- For QPSK with 100% RB allocation, SAR is not required when the highest maximum
output power for 100 % RB allocation is less than the highest maximum output power in 50% and 1 RB
allocations and the highest reported SAR for 1 RB and 50% RB allocation are ≤ 0.8 W/kg.
6. KDB941225D05-For QPSK with 100% RB allocation, when the reported SAR measured for the Highest
output power channel is <1.45 W/kg, tests for the remaining required test channels are optional.
7. KDB941225D05- other channel bandwidths SAR test is required when the highest maximum output power
of a configuration requiring testing in the smaller channel bandwidth is > ½ dB higher than the equivalent
channel configurations in the largest channel bandwidth configuration or the reported SAR of a configuration
for the largest channel bandwidth is > 1.45 W/kg.
8. KDB941225D05-SAR for higher order modulation is required only when the highest maximum output
power for the configuration in the higher order modulation is > ½ dB higher than the same configuration in
QPSK or when the reported SAR for the QPSK configuration is > 1.45 W/kg
9. KDB 648474 D04-When the peak SAR located in regions that probe is unable to access, a flat phantom is
used for SAR measurement.
SAR Evaluation Report
26 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Standalone SAR test exclusion considerations
Antennas Location:
LTE AUX
Antenna
WLAN /BT
Antenna
Top
54mm
124mm
Back
Front(Reverse)
Right
Left
117mm
WCDMA<E
Main Antenna
25mm
Bottom
Antenna Distance To Edge
Antenna Distance To Edge(mm)
Antenna
Back
Left
Right
Top
Bottom
WWAN(LTE)
<5
<5
25
124
<5
Standalone SAR test exclusion considerations
Mode
Frequency
(MHz)
Pavg
(dBm)
Pavg
(mW)
Min. Test
Distance
(mm)
Calculated
value
Threshold
(1-g)
SAR Test
Exclusion
Bluetooth
2480
9.8
9.55
3.0
YES
NOTE:
The 1-g and 10-g SAR test exclusion thresholds for 100 MHz to 6 GHz at test separation distances ≤ 50 mm are
determined by:
[( max. power of channel, including tune-up tolerance, mW )/( min. test separation distance, mm)] ·
[√f(GHz)] ≤ 3.0 for 1-g SAR and ≤7.5 for 10-g extremity SAR, where
1. f(GHz) is the RF channel transmit frequency in GHz.
2. Power and distance are rounded to the nearest mW and mm before calculation.
3. The result is rounded to one decimal place for comparison.
4. When the minimum test separation distance is < 5 mm, a distance of 5 mm is applied to determine SAR test
Exclusion.
SAR Evaluation Report
27 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Standalone SAR estimation:
Mode
Frequency
(MHz)
Pavg (dBm)
Pavg
(mW)
Distance
(mm)
Estimated 1-g
(W/kg)
BT Head
2480
9.8
9.55
0.40
BT Body
2480
9.8
9.55
10
0.20
When standalone SAR test exclusion applies to an antenna that transmits simultaneously with other
antennas, the standalone SAR must be estimated according to following to determine simultaneous
transmission SAR test exclusion:
[( max. power of channel, including tune-up tolerance , mW)/( min. test separation distance,mm)] ·
[√f(GHz)/x ]
W/kg for test separation distances ≤50 mm;
where x = 7.5 for 1-g SAR.
When the minimum test separation distance is < 5 mm, a distance of 5 mm is applied to determine SAR test
Exclusion
SAR test exclusion for the EUT edge considerations Result
Antenna Distance To Edge(mm)
Mode
Back
Left Side
Right Side
Top Side
Bottom Side
WWAN(LTE)
Required
Required
Required
Exclusion
Required
Note:
Required:The distance to Edge is less than 25mm, testing is required.
Exclusion*:SAR test exclusion evaluation has been done above.
Exclusion:The distance to Edge is more than 25 mm, testing is not required.
SAR Evaluation Report
28 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
SAR MEASUREMENT RESULTS
This page summarizes the results of the performed dosimetric evaluation.
SAR Test Data
Environmental Conditions
Temperature:
Relative Humidity:
ATM Pressure:
Test Date:
22.3-22.6 ℃
22.3-22.9 ℃
47 
45 
99.1 kPa
99.6 kPa
2018/10/17
2018/10/18
Testing was performed by Angelo Cha
LTE Band 40:
Plot
No.
Band
BW
(MHz)
Modulation
RB
RB
Size offset
Test
Gap
Position
(mm)
Ch.
Freq.
(MHz)
Average Tune-Up Power Measured Reported
Power
Limit
Drift
1g SAR
1g SAR
(dBm)
(dBm)
(dB)
(W/kg)
(W/kg)
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
Right Cheek
38750
2310
21.77
22
0.19
0.110
0.116
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
25
Right Cheek
38750
2310
21.67
22
-0.08
0.110
0.119
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
Right Tilted
38750
2310
21.77
22
0.17
0.010
0.010
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
25
Right Tilted
38750
2310
21.67
22
0.13
0.005
0.005
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
Left Cheek
38750
2310
21.77
22
0.01
0.087
0.092
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
25
Left Cheek
38750
2310
21.67
22
0.15
0.068
0.073
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
Left Tilted
38750
2310
21.77
22
-0.13
0.010
0.010
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
25
Left Tilted
38750
2310
21.67
22
0.14
0.006
0.006
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
Back
10
38750
2310
21.77
22
-0.04
0.572
0.603
10
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
25
Back
10
38750
2310
21.67
22
0.04
0.484
0.522
11
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
Left Side
10
38750
2310
21.77
22
0.07
0.054
0.057
12
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
25
Left Side
10
38750
2310
21.67
22
0.04
0.044
0.047
13
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
Right Side
10
38750
2310
21.77
22
0.1
0.011
0.012
14
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
25
Right Side
10
38750
2310
21.67
22
0.03
0.008
0.009
15
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
Bottom Side
10
38750
2310
21.77
22
-0.06
1.030
1.086
16
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
25
Bottom Side
10
38750
2310
21.67
22
-0.02
0.841
0.907
17
Lte Band 40
10
QPSK
50
Bottom Side
10
38750
2310
21.62
22
0.03
0.864
0.943
SAR Evaluation Report
29 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Note:
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
1. SAR for LTE band exposure configurations is measured according to the procedures of KDB 941225 D05
SAR for LTE Devices v02.
2. KDB941225D05- Start with the largest channel bandwidth and measure SAR for QPSK with 1 RB
allocation, using the RB offset and required test channel combination with the highest maximum output
power among RB offset the upper edge, middle and lower edge of each required test channel.
3. When the 1-g SAR is ≤ 0.8W/kg, testing for other channels are optional.
4. Worst case SAR for 50% RB allocation is selected to be tested.
5.KDB941225D05- For QPSK with 100% RB allocation, SAR is not required when the highest maximum
output power for 100 % RB allocation is less than the highest maximum output power in 50% and 1 RB
allocations and the highest reported SAR for 1 RB and 50% RB allocation are ≤ 0.8 W/kg.
6. KDB941225D05-For QPSK with 100% RB allocation, when the reported SAR measured for the Highest
output power channel is <1.45 W/kg, tests for the remaining required test channels are optional.
7. KDB941225D05- other channel bandwidths SAR test is required when the highest maximum output power
of a configuration requiring testing in the smaller channel bandwidth is > ½ dB higher than the equivalent
channel configurations in the largest channel bandwidth configuration or the reported SAR of a configuration
for the largest channel bandwidth is > 1.45 W/kg.
8. KDB941225D05-SAR for higher order modulation is required only when the highest maximum output
power for the configuration in the higher order modulation is > ½ dB higher than the same configuration in
QPSK or when the reported SAR for the QPSK configuration is > 1.45 W/kg
9. KDB 648474 D04-When the peak SAR located in regions that probe is unable to access, a flat phantom is
used for SAR measurement.
SAR Evaluation Report
30 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
SAR Measurement Variability
In accordance with published RF Exposure KDB procedure 865664 D01 SAR measurement 100 MHz to 6
GHz v01. These additional measurements are repeated after the completion of all measurements requiring
the same head or body tissue-equivalent medium in a frequency band. The test device should be returned
to ambient conditions (normal room temperature) with the battery fully charged before it is re-mounted on
the device holder for the repeated measurement(s) to minimize any unexpected variations in the repeated
results
1) Repeated measurement is not required when the original highest measured SAR is < 0.80 W/kg;
steps 2) through 4) do not apply.
2) When the original highest measured SAR is ≥ 0.80 W/kg, repeat that measurement once.
3) Perform a second repeated measurement only if the ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the
original and first repeated measurements is > 1.20 or when the original or repeated measurement
is ≥ 1.45 W/kg (~ 10% from the 1-g SAR limit).
4) Perform a third repeated measurement only if the original, first or second repeated measurement is
≥1.5 W/kg and the ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the original, first and second repeated
measurements is > 1.20.
Note: The same procedures should be adapted for measurements according to extremity and occupational
exposure limits by applying a factor of 2.5 for extremity exposure and a factor of 5 for occupational
exposure to the corresponding SAR thresholds.
The Highest Measured SAR Configuration in Each Frequency Band
Body
SAR probe calibration
point
Frequency
Band
Freq.(MHz)
2300
LTE Band
40
2310
EUT
Position
Bottom Side
Meas. SAR (W/kg)
Original
Repeated
Largest to
Smallest
SAR Ratio
1.086
1.133
4%
Note:
1. Second Repeated Measurement is not required since the ratio of the largest to smallest SAR for the original
and first repeated measurement is not > 1.20.
2. The measured SAR results do not have to be scaled to the maximum tune-up tolerance to determine if
repeated measurements are required.
3. SAR measurement variability must be assessed for each frequency band, which is determined by the SAR
probe calibration point and tissue-equivalent medium used for the device measurements..
SAR Evaluation Report
31 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
SAR Plots
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#01_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_1RB_0Offset_Right Cheek_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE ; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: HSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.705 S/m; εr = 41.236; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(8.26, 8.26, 8.26); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x131x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.157 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 4.322 V/m; Power Drift = 0.19 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.189 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.110 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.057 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.160 W/kg
0 dB = 0.160 W/kg = -7.96 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
32 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#02_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_25RB_0Offset_Right Cheek_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: HSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.705 S/m; εr = 41.236; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(8.26, 8.26, 8.26); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x131x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.167 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 10.58 V/m; Power Drift = -0.08 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.221 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.110 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.055 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.173 W/kg
0 dB = 0.173 W/kg = -7.62 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
33 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#03_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_1RB_0Offset_Right Tilted_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE ; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: HSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.705 S/m; εr = 41.236; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(8.26, 8.26, 8.26); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x131x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0478 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 2.734 V/m; Power Drift = 0.17 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0630 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.00961 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.00351 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0496 W/kg
0 dB = 0.0496 W/kg = -13.05 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
34 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#04_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_25RB_0Offset_Right Tilted_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: HSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.705 S/m; εr = 41.236; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(8.26, 8.26, 8.26); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x131x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0131 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 1.570 V/m; Power Drift = 0.13 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0280 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.00458 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.0016 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0190 W/kg
0 dB = 0.0190 W/kg = -17.21 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
35 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#05_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_1RB_0Offset_Left Cheek_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE ; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: HSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.705 S/m; εr = 41.236; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(8.26, 8.26, 8.26); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x131x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.127 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 8.406 V/m; Power Drift = 0.01 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.150 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.087 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.048 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.126 W/kg
0 dB = 0.126 W/kg = -9.00 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
36 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#06_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_25RB_0Offset_Left Cheek_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: HSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.705 S/m; εr = 41.236; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(8.26, 8.26, 8.26); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x131x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.101 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 4.583 V/m; Power Drift = 0.15 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.125 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.068 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.034 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.106 W/kg
0 dB = 0.106 W/kg = -9.75 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
37 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#07_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_1RB_0Offset_Left Tilted_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE ; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: HSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.705 S/m; εr = 41.236; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(8.26, 8.26, 8.26); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x131x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0321 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 1.040 V/m; Power Drift = -0.13 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0240 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.0098 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.00452 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0167 W/kg
0 dB = 0.0167 W/kg = -17.77 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
38 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#08_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_25RB_0Offset_Left Tilted_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: HSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.705 S/m; εr = 41.236; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(8.26, 8.26, 8.26); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x131x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0216 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 2.590 V/m; Power Drift = 0.14 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0250 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.00573 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.00222 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0178 W/kg
0 dB = 0.0178 W/kg = -17.50 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
39 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#9_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_1RB_0Offset_Back_10mm_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.836 S/m; εr = 53.082; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x141x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.926 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 13.86 V/m; Power Drift = -0.04 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.07 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.572 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.288 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.887 W/kg
0 dB = 0.887 W/kg = -0.52 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
40 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#10_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_25RB_0Offset_Back_10mm_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.836 S/m; εr = 53.082; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (81x141x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.777 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 12.65 V/m; Power Drift = 0.04 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.907 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.484 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.244 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.751 W/kg
0 dB = 0.751 W/kg = -1.24 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
41 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#11_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_1RB_0Offset_Left Side_10mm_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.836 S/m; εr = 53.082; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (41x141x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0765 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 6.476 V/m; Power Drift = 0.07 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0950 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.054 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.033 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0784 W/kg
0 dB = 0.0784 W/kg = -11.06 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
42 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#12_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_25RB_0Offset_Left Side_10mm_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.836 S/m; εr = 53.082; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (41x141x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0622 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 5.803 V/m; Power Drift = 0.04 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0780 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.044 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.026 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0643 W/kg
0 dB = 0.0643 W/kg = -11.92 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
43 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#13_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_1RB_0Offset_Right Side_10mm_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.836 S/m; εr = 53.082; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (41x141x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0332 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 3.303 V/m; Power Drift = 0.10 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0270 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.011 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.0044 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0158 W/kg
0 dB = 0.0158 W/kg = -18.01 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
44 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#14_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_25RB_0Offset_Right Side_10mm_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.836 S/m; εr = 53.082; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (41x141x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0231 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 3.359 V/m; Power Drift = 0.03 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0480 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.0084 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.00347 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0137 W/kg
0 dB = 0.0137 W/kg = -18.63 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
45 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#15_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_1RB_0Offset_Bottom Side_10mm_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.836 S/m; εr = 53.082; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (41x101x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.68 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 28.89 V/m; Power Drift = -0.06 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.92 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 1.03 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.514 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.59 W/kg
0 dB = 1.59 W/kg = 2.01 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
46 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#16_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_25RB_0Offset_Bottom Side_10mm_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.836 S/m; εr = 53.082; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (41x101x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.35 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 26.93 V/m; Power Drift = -0.06 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.53 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.841 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.431 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.26 W/kg
0 dB = 1.26 W/kg = 1.00 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
47 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Test Laboratory: BACL . SAR Testing Lab
#17_LTE Band 40_10M_QPSK_50RB_0Offset_Bottom Side_10mm_Ch38750
Communication System: LTE; Frequency: 2310 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:3
Medium: MSL2300 Medium parameters used: f = 2310 MHz; σ = 1.836 S/m; εr = 53.082; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
DASY5 Configuration:
- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7382; ConvF(7.99, 7.99, 7.99); Calibrated: 6/25/2018
- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
- Electronics: DAE4 Sn527; Calibrated: 8/14/2018
- Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0 (30deg probe tilt); Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1953
- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)
Ch38750/Area Scan (41x101x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm
Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.41 W/kg
Ch38750/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 25.48 V/m; Power Drift = 0.03 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.64 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.864 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.429 W/kg
Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.35 W/kg
0 dB = 1.35 W/kg = 1.30 dBW/kg
SAR Evaluation Report
48 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
APPENDIX A MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
The uncertainty budget has been determined for the measurement system and is given in the following
Table.
Measurement uncertainty evaluation for IEEE1528-2013 SAR test
Source of
uncertainty
Tolerance/
uncertainty
±%
Probability
distribution
Divisor
ci
(1 g)
ci
(10 g)
Standard
uncertainty
± %, (1 g)
Standard
uncertainty
± %, (10 g)
Measurement system
Probe calibration
6.55
6.6
6.6
Axial Isotropy
4.7
√3
2.7
2.7
Hemispherical Isotropy
9.6
√3
0.0
0.0
Boundary effect
1.0
√3
0.6
0.6
Linearity
4.7
√3
2.7
2.7
Detection limits
1.0
√3
0.6
0.6
Readout electronics
0.3
0.3
0.3
Response time
0.0
√3
0.0
0.0
Integration time
0.0
√3
0.0
0.0
RF ambient conditions – noise
1.0
√3
0.6
0.6
RF ambient
conditions–reflections
Probe positioner mech.
Restrictions
Probe positioning with respect to
phantom shell
1.0
√3
0.6
0.6
0.8
√3
0.5
0.5
6.7
√3
3.9
3.9
Post-processing
2.0
√3
1.2
1.2
Test sample related
Test sample positioning
2.8
2.8
2.8
Device holder uncertainty
6.3
6.3
6.3
Drift of output power
5.0
√3
2.9
2.9
Phantom and set-up
Phantom uncertainty (shape and
thickness tolerances)
4.0
√3
2.3
2.3
Liquid conductivity target)
5.0
√3
0.64
0.43
1.8
1.2
Liquid conductivity meas.)
2.5
0.64
0.43
1.6
1.1
Liquid permittivity target)
5.0
√3
0.6
0.49
1.7
1.4
Liquid permittivity meas.)
2.5
0.6
0.49
1.5
1.2
12.2
12.0
24.3
23.9
Combined standard uncertainty
Expanded uncertainty 95 %
confidence interval)
SAR Evaluation Report
RSS
49 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
Measurement uncertainty evaluation for IEC62209-2 SAR test
Source of
uncertainty
Tolerance/
uncertainty
±%
Probability
distribution
Divisor
ci
(1 g)
ci
(10 g)
Standard
uncertainty
± %, (1 g)
Standard
uncertainty
± %, (10 g)
Measurement system
Probe calibration
6.55
6.6
6.6
Axial Isotropy
4.7
√3
2.7
2.7
Hemispherical Isotropy
9.6
√3
0.0
0.0
Linearity
4.7
√3
2.7
2.7
Modulation Response
0.0
√3
0.0
0.0
Detection limits
1.0
√3
0.6
0.6
Boundary effect
1.0
√3
0.6
0.6
Readout electronics
0.3
0.3
0.3
Response time
0.0
√3
0.0
0.0
Integration time
0.0
√3
0.0
0.0
RF ambient conditions – noise
1.0
√3
0.6
0.6
RF ambient conditions–reflections
1.0
√3
0.6
0.6
Probe positioner mech.
Restrictions
0.8
√3
0.5
0.5
Probe positioning with respect to
phantom shell
6.7
√3
3.9
3.9
Post-processing
2.0
√3
1.2
1.2
Test sample related
Device holder Uncertainty
6.3
6.3
6.3
Test sample positioning
2.8
2.8
2.8
Power scaling
4.5
√3
2.6
2.6
Drift of output power
5.0
√3
2.9
2.9
Phantom and set-up
Phantom uncertainty (shape and
thickness tolerances)
4.0
√3
2.3
2.3
Algorithm for correcting SAR for
deviations in permittivity and
conductivity
1.9
0.84
1.1
0.9
Liquid conductivity (meas.)
2.5
0.64
0.43
1.6
1.1
Liquid permittivity (meas.)
2.5
0.6
0.49
1.5
1.2
Temp. unc. - Conductivity
1.7
√3
0.78
0.71
0.8
0.7
Temp. unc. - Permittivity
0.3
√3
0.23
0.26
0.0
0.0
12.2
12.1
24.5
24.2
Combined standard uncertainty
Expanded uncertainty 95 %
confidence interval)
SAR Evaluation Report
RSS
50 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
APPENDIX B EUT TEST POSITION PHOTOS
Please Refer to the Attachment.
SAR Evaluation Report
51 of 52
Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Taiwan)
Report No.: RXZ181012004-23
APPENDIX C CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES
Please Refer to the Attachment.
***** END OF REPORT *****
SAR Evaluation Report
52 of 52
Download: GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Mirror Download [FCC.gov]GLMG18A01 4G Wireless Data Terminal RF Exposure Info SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW HONGKONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Document ID4122471
Application IDe7cnxhvHF7HzKO72jmPuSQ==
Document DescriptionSAR Test Report
Short Term ConfidentialNo
Permanent ConfidentialNo
SupercedeNo
Document TypeRF Exposure Info
Display FormatAdobe Acrobat PDF - pdf
Filesize128.72kB (1609031 bits)
Date Submitted2018-12-28 00:00:00
Date Available2018-12-28 00:00:00
Creation Date2018-12-26 13:21:53
Producing SoftwareAcrobat Distiller 9.0.0 (Windows)
Document Lastmod2018-12-26 13:22:15
Document TitleSAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW
Document CreatorPScript5.dll Version 5.2.2
Document Author: Administrator

Source Exif Data [exif.tools]:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.6
Linearized                      : No
Author                          : Administrator
Create Date                     : 2018:12:26 13:21:53+08:00
Modify Date                     : 2018:12:26 13:22:15+08:00
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 4.2.1-c041 52.342996, 2008/05/07-20:48:00
Producer                        : Acrobat Distiller 9.0.0 (Windows)
Creator Tool                    : PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2
Metadata Date                   : 2018:12:26 13:22:15+08:00
Format                          : application/pdf
Title                           : Microsoft Word - SAR Report RXZ181012004-23_TW
Creator                         : Administrator
Document ID                     : uuid:6f54cf62-b77e-487e-8673-a784f7e085f8
Instance ID                     : uuid:ed09939a-72cb-48b8-88e6-50bfd74d1b78
Page Count                      : 52