PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.

Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd. Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway

Page 1 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 2 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 3 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 4 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 5 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 6 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 7 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 8 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 9 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 10 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 11 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 12 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 13 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 14 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 15 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 16 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 17 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 18 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 19 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 20 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 21 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 22 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 23 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 24 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 25 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 26 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 27 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 28 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 29 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 30 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 31 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 32 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 33 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 34 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 35 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 36 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 37 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 38 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 39 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 40 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 41 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 42 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 43 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 44 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 45 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 46 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 47 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 48 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 49 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 50 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 51 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 52 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 53 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 54 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Page 55 of PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.

Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 1 of 54
FCC Test Report
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
FCC ID
: 2AKOIPHGW
APPLICATION PURPOSE
: Original Equipment
PRODUCT DESIGNATION
: Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
BRAND NAME
: Vcare
MODEL NAME
: PH-GW
CLIENT
: Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
DATE OF ISSUE
: Dec. 20, 2016
STANDARD(S)
TEST PROCEDURE(S)
REPORT VERSION
: V1.0
FCC Part 15.247
KDB 558074 v03r02
Attestation of Global Compliance (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd
CAUTION:
This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written permission of the
test laboratory and shall not be quoted out of context.
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 2 of 54
Report Revise Record
Report Version
Revise Time
Issued Date
Valid Version
Notes
V1.0
Dec. 20, 2016
Valid
Original Report
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 3 of 54
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. VERIFICATION OF CONFORMITY ...................................................................................... 5
2. GENERAL INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 6
2.1. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 6
2.2. TABLE OF CARRIER FREQUENCYS ....................................................................................... 6
2.3. IEEE 802.11N MODULATION SCHEME .................................................................................... 7
2.4. RELATED SUBMITTAL(S) / GRANT (S) .................................................................................... 7
2.5. TEST METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 7
2.6. SPECIAL ACCESSORIES ......................................................................................................... 7
2.7. EQUIPMENT MODIFICATIONS ................................................................................................. 8
3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY........................................................................................ 9
4. DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES........................................................................................ 9
5. SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION .................................................................................... 10
5.1. CONFIGURATION OF EUT SYSTEM ...................................................................................... 10
5.2. EQUIPMENT USED IN EUT SYSTEM ..................................................................................... 10
5.3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS .............................................................................................. 10
6. TEST FACILITY .................................................................................................................. 11
7. OUTPUT POWER ............................................................................................................... 13
7.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE .............................................................................................. 13
7.2. TEST SET-UP (BLOCK DIAGRAM OF CONFIGURATION) ..................................................... 14
7.3. LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT .................................................................................. 15
8. 6DB BANDWIDTH .............................................................................................................. 16
8.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE .............................................................................................. 16
8.2. TEST SET-UP (BLOCK DIAGRAM OF CONFIGURATION) ..................................................... 16
8.3. LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULTS................................................................................ 16
9. CONDUCTED SPURIOUS EMISSION ............................................................................... 19
9.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE .............................................................................................. 19
9.2. TEST SET-UP (BLOCK DIAGRAM OF CONFIGURATION) ..................................................... 19
9.3. MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT USED..................................................................................... 19
9.4. LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT .................................................................................. 19
10. MAXIMUM CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY .............................. 25
10.1 MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE ............................................................................................. 25
10.2 TEST SET-UP (BLOCK DIAGRAM OF CONFIGURATION) .................................................... 25
10.3 MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT USED.................................................................................... 25
10.4 LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT ................................................................................. 25
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 4 of 54
11. RADIATED EMISSION ..................................................................................................... 28
11.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE ............................................................................................ 28
11.2. TEST SETUP ......................................................................................................................... 29
11.3. LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT ................................................................................ 30
11.4. TEST RESULT ....................................................................................................................... 30
12. BAND EDGE EMISSION .................................................................................................. 39
12.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE ............................................................................................ 39
12.2. TEST SET-UP ........................................................................................................................ 39
12.3. Radiated Test Result .............................................................................................................. 40
12.4. Conducted Test Result ........................................................................................................... 41
13. FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ..................................................................... 43
13.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ................................................................. 43
13.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ............................................... 43
13.3. PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ............................. 44
13.4. FINAL PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ........................................... 44
13.5. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ..................................................... 45
APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP ............................................................... 47
APPENDIX B: PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT .............................................................................. 49
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 5 of 54
1. VERIFICATION OF CONFORMITY
Applicant
Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Address
Building 11, Tongfuyu Industry Zone,Tanglang, Xili Town, Nanshan District,
Shenzhen,China
Manufacturer
Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Address
Building 11, Tongfuyu Industry Zone,Tanglang, Xili Town, Nanshan District,
Shenzhen,China
Product Designation
Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway
Brand Name
Vcare
Test Model
PH-GW
Date of test
Dec. 01, 2016~Dec. 18, 2016
Deviation
None
Condition of Test Sample
Normal
Report Template
AGCRT-US-BGN/RF
We hereby certify that:
The above equipment was tested by Dongguan Precise Testing Service Co., Ltd. The test data, data
evaluation, test procedures, and equipment configurations shown in this report were made in accordance with
the procedures given in ANSI C63.10 (2013) and the energy emitted by the sample EUT tested as described
in this report is in compliance with requirement of FCC Part 15 Rules requirement.
Tested By
Donjon Yang Huang(Huang
Dongyang)
Dec. 18, 2016
Bart Xie(Xie Xiaobin)
Dec. 20, 2016
Solger Zhang(Zhang Hongyi)
Authorized Officer
Dec. 20, 2016
Reviewed By
Approved By
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 6 of 54
2. GENERAL INFORMATION
2.1. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
The EUT is designed as “Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd. ”. It is designed by way of utilizing the
DSSS and OFDM technology to achieve the system operation.
A major technical description of EUT is described as following
Operation Frequency
2.412 GHz~2.462GHz
Output Power
IEEE 802.11b:13.25dBm; IEEE 802.11g:10.97dBm;
IEEE 802.11n(20):10.94dBm
Modulation
DSSS(DBPSK/DQPSK/CCK);OFDM(BPSK/QPSK/16-QAM/64-QAM)
Number of channels
11
Hardware Version
818-20160727
Software Version
V0.1_PH3GSMWF4161014
Antenna Designation
PCB Antenna
Antenna Gain
2.18dBi
Power Supply
DC7.4V by Built-in Li-ion Battery
2.2. TABLE OF CARRIER FREQUENCYS
Frequency Band
2400~2483.5MHZ
Channel Number
Frequency
2412 MHZ
2417 MHZ
2422 MHZ
2427 MHZ
2432 MHZ
2437 MHZ
2442 MHZ
2447 MHZ
2452 MHZ
10
2457 MHZ
11
2462 MHZ
Note: For 20MHZ bandwidth system use Channel 1 to Channel 11
For 40MHZ bandwidth system use Channel 3 to Channel 9
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 7 of 54
2.3. IEEE 802.11N MODULATION SCHEME
MCS
Index
NCBPS
Nss
Modulation
Data
rate(Mbps)
NDBPS
NBPSC
800nsGI
20MHz
40MHz
20MHz
40MHz
20MHz
40MHz
BPSK
1/2
52
108
26
54
6.5
13.5
QPSK
1/2
104
216
52
108
13.0
27.0
QPSK
3/4
104
216
78
162
19.5
40.5
16-QAM
1/2
208
432
104
216
26.0
54.0
16-QAM
3/4
208
432
156
324
39.0
81.0
64-QAM
2/3
312
648
208
432
52.0
108.0
64-QAM
3/4
312
648
234
489
58.5
121.5
64-QAM
5/6
312
648
260
540
65.0
135.0
Symbol
Explanation
NSS
Number of spatial streams
Code rate
NBPSC
Number of coded bits per single carrier
NCBPS
Number of coded bits per symbol
NDBPS
Number of data bits per symbol
GI
Guard interval
2.4. RELATED SUBMITTAL(S) / GRANT (S)
This submittal(s) (test report) is intended for FCC ID: 2AKOIPHGW, filing to comply with the FCC Part 15
requirements.
2.5. TEST METHODOLOGY
Both conducted and radiated testing was performed according to the procedures in ANSI C63.10 (2013).
Radiated testing was performed at an antenna to EUT distance 3 meters.
Others testing (listed at item 5.3) was performed according to the procedures in FCC Part 15.247 rules KDB
558074 D01 DTS Meas Guidance v03r02.
2.6. SPECIAL ACCESSORIES
Refer to section 5.2.
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 8 of 54
2.7. EQUIPMENT MODIFICATIONS
Not available for this EUT intended for grant.
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 9 of 54
3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
Conducted measurement: +/- 2.75dB
Radiated measurement: +/- 3.2dB
4. DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES
NO.
TEST MODE DESCRIPTION
Low channel TX
Middle channel TX
High channel TX
Normal operating
Note:
Transmit by 802.11b with Date rate (1/2/5.5/11)
Transmit by 802.11g with Date rate (6/9/12/18/24/36/48/54)
Transmit by 802.11n (20MHz) with Date rate (6.5/13/19.5/26/39/52/58.5/65)
Note:
1. The EUT has been set to operate continuously on the lowest, middle and highest operation frequency
Individually, and the eut is operating at its maximum duty cycle>or equal 98%
2. All modes under which configure applicable have been tested and the worst mode test data recording
in the test report, if no other mode data.
3. For Radiated Emission, 3axis were chosen for testing for each applicable mode.
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 10 of 54
5. SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION
5.1. CONFIGURATION OF EUT SYSTEM
Configure:
EUT
Accessory
5.2. EQUIPMENT USED IN EUT SYSTEM
Item
Equipment
Model No.
ID or Specification
Note
Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway
PH-GW
2AKOIPHGW
EUT
Adapter
RS-AB1000
DC12V /1A
Accessory
Battery
PH-GW
DC7.4V/800mAh
Accessory
Temperature and humidity sensor
N/A
N/A
Accessory
Note: All the accessories have been used during the test in conduction emission test.
5.3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
FCC RULES
DESCRIPTION OF TEST
RESULT
§15.247
Output Power
Compliant
§15.247
6 dB Bandwidth
Compliant
§15.247
Conducted Spurious Emission
Compliant
§15.247
Maximum Conducted Output Power SPECTRAL Density
Compliant
§15.209
Radiated Emission
Compliant
§15.247
Band Edges
Compliant
§15.207
Line Conduction Emission
Compliant
Note: The EUT received power from DC3.8V lithium battery.
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 11 of 54
6. TEST FACILITY
Site
Location
FCC Registration No.
Description
Dongguan Precise Testing Service Co., Ltd.
Building D,Baoding Technology Park,Guangming Road2,Dongcheng District,
Dongguan, Guangdong, China,
371540
The test site is constructed and calibrated to meet the FCC requirements in
documents ANSI C63.10:2013.
ALL TEST EQUIPMENT LIST
FOR RADIATED EMISSION TEST (BELOW 1GHZ)
Radiated Emission Test Site
Serial
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model Number
Number
EMI Test Receiver
Rohde & Schwarz
ESCI
101417
Trilog Broadband
SCHWARZBECK
VULB9160
9160-3355
Antenna (25M-1GHz)
Last
Calibration
July 3, 2016
Due
Calibration
July 2, 2017
July 3, 2016
July 2, 2017
Signal Amplifier
SCHWARZBECK
BBV 9475
9745-0013
July 3, 2016
July 2, 2017
RF Cable
SCHWARZBECK
AK9515E
96221
July 3, 2016
July 2, 2017
3m Anechoic Chamber
CHENGYU
966
PTS-001
Max-Full
MF-7802
MF780208339
Schwarzbeck
FMZB1519
1519-038
June 5, 2016 June 4, 2017
Spectrum analyzer
Agilent
E4407B
MY46185649
June 5, 2016 June 4, 2017
Power Probe
R&S
NRP-Z23
100323
July 24,2016
July 23,2017
RF attenuator
N/A
RFA20db
68
N/A
N/A
Last
Calibration
July 3, 2016
Due
Calibration
July 2, 2017
July 10, 2016
July 9, 2017
MULTI-DEVICE
Positioning Controller
Active loop antenna
(9K-30MHz)
FOR RADIATED EMISSION TEST (1GHZ ABOVE)
Radiated Emission Test Site
Serial
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model Number
Number
EMI Test Receiver
Rohde & Schwarz
ESCI
101417
Horn Antenna
SCHWARZBECK
BBHA9120D
9120D-1246
(1G-18GHz)
June 5, 2016 June 4, 2017
N/A
N/A
Spectrum Analyzer
Agilent
E4411B
MY4511453
July 3, 2016
July 2, 2017
Signal Amplifier
SCHWARZBECK
BBV 9718
9718-269
July 6, 2016
July 5, 2017
RF Cable
SCHWARZBECK
AK9515H
96220
July 7, 2016
July 6, 2017
3m Anechoic Chamber
CHENGYU
966
PTS-001
MULTI-DEVICE
Positioning Controller
Max-Full
MF-7802
MF780208339
June 5, 2016 June 4, 2017
N/A
N/A
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 12 of 54
Horn Ant (18G-40GHz)
Schwarzbeck
BBHA 9170
9170-181
June 5, 2016 June 4, 2017
Power Probe
R&S
NRP-Z23
100323
July 24,2016
July 23,2017
RF attenuator
N/A
RFA20db
68
N/A
N/A
Conducted Emission Test Site
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model Number
Serial Number
EMI Test Receiver
Artificial Mains
Network
Artificial Mains
Network (AUX)
RF Cable
Rohde & Schwarz
ESCI
101417
Last
Due
Calibration Calibration
July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017
Narda
L2-16B
000WX31025
July 7, 2016 July 6, 2017
Narda
L2-16B
000WX31026
July 7, 2016 July 6, 2017
SCHWARZBECK
AK9515E
96222
July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017
Shielded Room
CHENGYU
843
PTS-002
June 5,2016 June 4,2017
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 13 of 54
7. OUTPUT POWER
7.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE
For max average conducted output power test:
1. Connect EUT RF output port to power probe through an RF attenuator.
2. Connect the power probe to the PC.
3. Set the EUT Work on the top, the middle and the bottom operation frequency individually.
4. Record the maximum power from the software.
Note:The EUT was tested according to KDB 558074v03r02 for compliance to FCC 47CFR 15.247
requirements.
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 14 of 54
7.2. TEST SET-UP (BLOCK DIAGRAM OF CONFIGURATION)
AVERAGE POWER SETUP
EUT
Attenuator
Power Sensor
PC
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 15 of 54
7.3. LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT
TEST ITEM
OUTPUT POWER
TEST MODE
802.11b with data rate 1
Frequency
(GHz)
Average Power
(dBm)
Applicable Limits
(dBm)
Pass or Fail
2.412
13.25
30
Pass
2.437
13.12
30
Pass
2.462
12.44
30
Pass
TEST ITEM
OUTPUT POWER
TEST MODE
802.11g with data rate 6
Frequency
(GHz)
Average Power
(dBm)
Applicable Limits
(dBm)
Pass or Fail
2.412
10.97
30
Pass
2.437
10.67
30
Pass
2.462
10.83
30
Pass
TEST ITEM
OUTPUT POWER
TEST MODE
802.11n 20 with data rate 6.5
Frequency
(GHz)
Average Power
(dBm)
Applicable Limits
(dBm)
Pass or Fail
2.412
10.94
30
Pass
2.437
10.93
30
Pass
2.462
10.20
30
Pass
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 16 of 54
8. 6DB BANDWIDTH
8.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE
1. Connect EUT RF output port to the Spectrum Analyzer through an RF attenuator
2. Set the EUT Work on the top, the middle and the bottom operation frequency individually.
3. Set SPA Centre Frequency = Operation Frequency, RBW= 100 KHz, VBW≥3×RBW.
4. Set SPA Trace 1 Max hold, then View.
Note: The EUT was tested according to KDB 558074 for compliance to FCC 47CFR 15.247 requirements.
8.2. TEST SET-UP (BLOCK DIAGRAM OF CONFIGURATION)
8.3. LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULTS
Mode
11B
11G
11nHT20
Channel
6dB Bandwidth [MHz]
Verdict
LCH
10.10
PASS
MCH
10.10
PASS
HCH
10.10
PASS
LCH
16.37
PASS
MCH
16.38
PASS
HCH
16.38
PASS
LCH
17.62
PASS
MCH
17.61
PASS
HCH
17.62
PASS
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 17 of 54
Test Graph
11B-LCH
11B-MCH
11B-HCH
11G-LCH
11G-MCH
11G-HCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 18 of 54
11nHT20-LCH
11nHT20-HCH
11nHT20-MCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 19 of 54
9. CONDUCTED SPURIOUS EMISSION
9.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE
1. Connect EUT RF output port to the Spectrum Analyzer through an RF attenuator
2, Set the EUT Work on the top, the middle and the bottom operation frequency individually.
3. Set SPA Trace 1 Max hold, then View.
Note: The EUT was tested according to KDB 558074 for compliance to FCC 47CFR 15.247 requirements.
Owing to satisfy the requirements of the number of measurement points, we set the RBW=1MHz,
VBW>RBW, scan up through 10th harmonic, and consider the tested results as the worst case, if the
tested results conform to the requirement, we can deem that the real tested results(set the
RBW=100KHz, VBW>RBW) are conform to the requirement.
9.2. TEST SET-UP (BLOCK DIAGRAM OF CONFIGURATION)
The same as described in section 8.2.
9.3. MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT USED
The same as described in section 6.
9.4. LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT
LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT
Measurement Result
Applicable Limits
In any 100 KHz Bandwidth Outside the
frequency band in which the spread spectrum
intentional radiator is operating, the radio frequency
power that is produce by the intentional radiator
shall be at least 20 dB below that in 100KHz
bandwidth within the band that contains the highest
level of the desired power.
In addition, radiation emissions which fall in the
restricted bands, as defined in §15.205(a), must also
comply with the radiated emission limits specified
in§15.209(a))
Test Data
Criteria
At least -20dBc than the limit
Specified on the BOTTOM
Channel
PASS
At least -20dBc than the limit
Specified on the TOP Channel
PASS
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 20 of 54
Test Graph
11B-LCH
11B-LCH
11B-LCH
11B-MCH
11B-MCH
11B-MCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 21 of 54
11B-HCH
11B-HCH
11B-HCH
11G-LCH
11G-LCH
11G-LCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 22 of 54
11G-MCH
11G-MCH
11G-MCH
11G-HCH
11G-HCH
11G-HCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 23 of 54
11nHT20-LCH
11nHT20-LCH
11nHT20-LCH
11nHT20-MCH
11nHT20-MCH
11nHT20-MCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 24 of 54
11nHT20-HCH
11nHT20-HCH
11nHT20-HCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 25 of 54
10. MAXIMUM CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY
10.1 MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE
(1). Connect EUT RF output port to the Spectrum Analyzer through an RF attenuator
(2). Set the EUT Work on the top, the middle and the bottom operation frequency individually.
(3). Set SPA Trace 1 Max hold, then View.
Note: The method of AVGPSD in the KDB 558074 item 10.3 was used in this testing.
10.2 TEST SET-UP (BLOCK DIAGRAM OF CONFIGURATION)
Refer To Section 8.2.
10.3 MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT USED
Refer To Section 6.
10.4 LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT
Mode
11B
11G
11nHT20
Channel
PSD [dBm/3kHz]
Limit[dBm/3kHz]
Verdict
LCH
-10.017
PASS
MCH
-9.818
PASS
HCH
-10.109
PASS
LCH
-13.657
PASS
MCH
-14.234
PASS
HCH
-14.077
PASS
LCH
-14.034
PASS
MCH
-14.927
PASS
HCH
-14.527
PASS
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 26 of 54
Test Graph
11B-LCH
11B-MCH
11B-HCH
11G-LCH
11G-MCH
11G-HCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 27 of 54
11nHT20-LCH
11nHT20-HCH
11nHT20-MCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 28 of 54
11. RADIATED EMISSION
11.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE
1. Configure the EUT according to ANSI C63.10. The EUT was placed on the top of the turntable 0.8 meter
above ground. The phase center of the receiving antenna mounted on the top of a height-variable
antenna tower was placed 3 meters far away from the turntable.
2. Power on the EUT and all the supporting units. The turntable was rotated by 360 degrees to determine
the position of the highest radiation.
3. The height of the broadband receiving antenna was varied between one meter and four meters above
ground to find the maximum emissions field strength of both horizontal and vertical polarization.
4. For each suspected emissions, the antenna tower was scan (from 1 M to 4 M) and then the turntable was
rotated (from 0 degree to 360 degrees) to find the maximum reading.
5. Set the test-receiver system to Peak or CISPR quasi-peak Detect Function with specified bandwidth
under Maximum Hold Mode.
6. For emissions above 1GHz, use 1MHz VBW and RBW for peak reading. Then 1MHz RBW and 10Hz
VBW for average reading in spectrum analyzer. The EUT was placed on the top of the turntable 1.5 meter
above ground. The phase center of the receiving antenna mounted on the top of a height-variable
antenna tower was placed 3 meters far away from the turntable.
7. When the radiated emissions limits are expressed in terms of the average value of the emissions, and
pulsed operation is employed, the measurement field strength shall be determined by averaging over one
complete pulse train, including blanking intervals, as long as the pulse train does not exceed 0.1 seconds.
As an alternative (provided the transmitter operates for longer than 0.1 seconds) or in cases where the
pulse train exceeds 0.1 seconds, the measured field strength shall be determined from the average
absolute voltage during a 0.1 second interval during which the field strength is at its maximum values.
8.If the emissions level of the EUT in peak mode was 3 dB lower than the average limit specified, then
testing will be stopped and peak values of EUT will be reported, otherwise, the emissions which do not
have 3 dB margin will be repeated one by one using the quasi-peak method for below 1GHz.
9. For testing above 1GHz, the emissions level of the EUT in peak mode was lower than average limit (that
means the emissions level in peak mode also complies with the limit in average mode), then testing will
be stopped and peak values of EUT will be reported, otherwise, the emissions will be measured in
average mode again and reported.
10. In case the emission is lower than 30MHz, loop antenna has to be used for measurement and the
recorded data should be QP measured by receiver. High - Low scan is not required in this case.
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 29 of 54
11.2. TEST SETUP
RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP 30MHz-1000MHz
RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP ABOVE 1000MHz
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 30 of 54
11.3. LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT
15.209(a) Limit in the below table has to be followed
Frequencies
(MHz)
Field Strength
(micorvolts/meter)
Measurement Distance
(meters)
0.009~0.490
2400/F(KHz)
300
0.490~1.705
24000/F(KHz)
30
1.705~30.0
30
30
30~88
100
88~216
150
216~960
200
Above 960
500
Note: All modes were tested For restricted band radiated emission,
the test records reported below are the worst result compared to other modes.
11.4. TEST RESULT
RADIATED EMISSION BELOW 30MHZ
No emission found between lowest internal used/generated frequencies to 30MHz.
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 31 of 54
RADIATED EMISSION BELOW 1GHZ
EUT
Smart Security Alarm
System-Gateway
Model Name
PH-GW
Temperature
25°C
Relative Humidity
54.2%
Pressure
960hPa
Test Voltage
Normal Voltage
Test Mode
802.11b with date rate 1
2412MHZ
Antenna
Horizontal
RESULT: PASS
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 32 of 54
EUT
Smart Security Alarm
System-Gateway
Model Name
PH-GW
Temperature
25°C
Relative Humidity
54.2%
Pressure
960hPa
Test Voltage
Normal Voltage
Test Mode
802.11b with date rate 1
2412MHZ
Antenna
Vertical
RESULT: PASS
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 33 of 54
EUT
Smart Security Alarm
System-Gateway
Model Name
PH-GW
Temperature
25°C
Relative Humidity
54.2%
Pressure
960hPa
Test Voltage
Normal Voltage
Test Mode
802.11b with date rate 1
2437MHZ
Antenna
Horizontal
RESULT: PASS
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 34 of 54
EUT
Smart Security Alarm
System-Gateway
Model Name
PH-GW
Temperature
25°C
Relative Humidity
54.2%
Pressure
960hPa
Test Voltage
Normal Voltage
Test Mode
802.11b with date rate 1
2437MHZ
Antenna
Vertical
RESULT: PASS
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 35 of 54
EUT
Smart Security Alarm
System-Gateway
Model Name
PH-GW
Temperature
25°C
Relative Humidity
54.2%
Pressure
960hPa
Test Voltage
Normal Voltage
Test Mode
802.11b with date rate 1
2462MHZ
Antenna
Horizontal
RESULT: PASS
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 36 of 54
EUT
Smart Security Alarm
System-Gateway
Model Name
PH-GW
Temperature
25°C
Relative Humidity
54.2%
Pressure
960hPa
Test Voltage
Normal Voltage
Test Mode
802.11b with date rate 1
2462MHZ
Antenna
Vertical
RESULT: PASS
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 37 of 54
Note: 1. Factor=Antenna Factor + Cable loss, Margin= Result -Limit.
2. The “Factor” value can be calculated automatically by software of measurement system.
3. 30MHz~1GHz:(Scan with 11b,11g,11n, the worst case is 11b Mode)
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 38 of 54
RADIATED EMISSION ABOVE 1GHZ
Frequency
Meter Reading
Factor
(MHz)
(dBμV)
(dB)
4824.092
4824.092
7236.127
7236.127
4824.098
4824.082
7236.110
7236.054
43.67
31.93
47.24
33.77
39.42
30.8
45.02
32.16
10.44
10.44
10.39
10.39
10.39
10.39
10.68
10.68
4874.072
4874.108
7311.092
7311.131
4874.098
4874.044
7311.145
7311.104
42.93
34.39
42.41
30.81
45.27
31.69
47.26
30.25
10.39
10.39
12.68
12.68
10.39
10.39
12.68
12.68
4924.128
4924.083
7386.071
7386.134
4924.042
4924.060
7386.051
7386.054
41.6
34.33
44.29
31.02
41.82
33.21
43.7
30.86
10.39
10.39
12.68
12.68
10.39
10.39
12.68
12.68
Emission Level
Limits
(dBμV/m)
(dBμV/m)
TX 11b 2412MHz
54.11
74
42.37
54
57.63
74
44.16
54
49.81
74
41.19
54
55.7
74
42.84
54
TX 11b 2437MHz
53.32
74
44.78
54
55.09
74
43.49
54
55.66
74
42.08
54
59.94
74
42.93
54
TX 11b 2462MHz
51.99
74
44.72
54
56.97
74
43.7
54
52.21
74
43.6
54
56.38
74
43.54
54
Margin
Detector
(dB)
Type
-19.89
-11.63
-16.37
-9.84
-24.19
-12.81
-18.3
-11.16
Pk
AV
pk
AV
Pk
AV
Pk
AV
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
-20.68
-9.22
-18.91
-10.51
-18.34
-11.92
-14.06
-11.07
Pk
AV
Pk
AV
Pk
AV
Pk
AV
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
-22.01
-9.28
-17.03
-10.3
-21.79
-10.4
-17.62
-10.46
pk
AV
pk
AV
pk
AV
pk
AV
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
RESULT: PASS
Note: 1~25GHz scan with 11b. No recording in the test report at least have 20dB margin.
Factor = Antenna Factor + Cable Loss – Pre-amplifier.
Emission Level = Meter Reading + Factor
Margin = Emission Leve - Limit
Comment
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 39 of 54
12. BAND EDGE EMISSION
12.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE
1)Radiated restricted band edge measurements
The radiated restricted band edge measurements are measured with an EMI test receiver connected to the
receive antenna while the EUT is transmitting
2)Conducted Emissions at the bang edge
a)The transmitter output was connected to the spectrum analyzer
b)Set RBW=100kHz,VBW=300kHz
c)Suitable frequency span including 100kHz bandwidth from band edge
12.2. TEST SET-UP
Radiated same as 11.2
Conducted set up
EUT
Spectrum analyzer
cable
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 40 of 54
12.3. Radiated Test Result
(MHz)
Meter
Reading
(dBμV)
2399.9
2399.9
2400
2400
2399.9
2399.9
2400
2400
71.94
56.91
75.58
56.33
72.69
54.19
76.05
51.44
-13
-13
-12.99
-12.99
-12.97
-12.97
-12.94
-12.94
2483.5
2483.5
2483.6
2483.6
2483.5
2483.5
2483.6
2483.6
72.89
52.27
72.97
50.52
76.67
53.01
71.67
54.58
-12.78
-12.78
-12.77
-12.77
-12.76
-12.76
-12.72
-12.72
Frequency
Factor
(dB)
Emission
Limits
Level
(dBμV/m)
(dBμV/m)
TX 11b 2412MHz
58.94
74
43.91
54
62.59
74
43.34
54
59.72
74
41.22
54
63.11
74
38.5
54
TX 11b 2462MHz
60.11
74
39.49
54
60.2
74
37.75
54
63.91
74
40.25
54
58.95
74
41.86
54
Margin
Detector
(dB)
Type
-15.06
-10.09
-11.41
-10.66
-14.28
-12.78
-10.89
-15.5
pk
AV
pk
AV
pk
AV
pk
AV
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
-13.89
-14.51
-13.8
-16.25
-10.09
-13.75
-15.05
-12.14
pk
AV
pk
AV
pk
AV
pk
AV
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Horizontal
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
Vertical
RESULT: PASS
Note: Scan with 11b,11g,11n, the worst casw is 11b Mode
Factor=Antenna Factor + Cable loss - Amplifier gain,
Emission Level = Meter Reading + Factor
Margin= Emission Level -Limit.
The “Factor” value can be calculated automatically by software of measurement system.
Comment
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 41 of 54
12.4. Conducted Test Result
Mode
Channel
Carrier Power[dBm]
Max.Spurious Level
[dBm]
Limit [dBm]
Verdict
LCH
4.184
-35.346
-15.82
PASS
HCH
3.409
-53.324
-16.59
PASS
LCH
0.311
-34.875
-19.69
PASS
HCH
-0.255
-47.883
-20.26
PASS
LCH
0.585
-30.650
-19.42
PASS
HCH
-0.154
-46.075
-20.15
PASS
11B
11G
11N20SISO
Test Graph
11B-LCH
11B-HCH
11G-LCH
11G-HCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 42 of 54
11nHT20-LCH
11nHT20-HCH
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 43 of 54
13. FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST
13.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST
Maximum RF Line Voltage
Frequency
Q.P.( dBuV)
Average( dBuV)
150kHz~500kHz
66-56
56-46
500kHz~5MHz
56
46
5MHz~30MHz
60
50
Note:
1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency.
2. The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.50 MHz.
13.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST
EUT & Support
Units
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 44 of 54
13.3. PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST
1. The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical actual usage per the user’s
manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is
placed on the ground plane as per ANSI C63.10 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane
used). When the EUT is a floor-standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12
mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane.
2. Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per ANSI C63.10.
3. All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per ANSI C63.10.
4. All support equipments received AC120V/60Hz power from a LISN, if any.
5. The EUT received charging voltage by adapter which received 120V/60Hzpower by a LISN..
6. The test program was started. Emissions were measured on each current carrying line of the EUT using a
spectrum Analyzer / Receiver connected to the LISN powering the EUT. The LISN has two monitoring
points: Line 1 (Hot Side) and Line 2 (Neutral Side). Two scans were taken: one with Line 1 connected to
Analyzer / Receiver and Line 2 connected to a 50 ohm load; the second scan had Line 1 connected to a
50 ohm load and Line 2 connected to the Analyzer / Receiver.
7. Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 150 kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes.
8. During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation.
9. The test mode(s) were scanned during the preliminary test.
Then, the EUT configuration and cable configuration of the above highest emission level were recorded for
reference of final testing.
13.4. FINAL PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST
1.
2.
3.
EUT and support equipment was set up on the test bench as per step 2 of the preliminary test.
A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six highest emissions.
Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used
to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the applicable limit. If EUT emission level was
less –2dB to the A.V. limit in Peak mode, then the emission signal was re-checked using Q.P and Average
detector.
The test data of the worst case condition(s) was reported on the Summary Data page.
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 45 of 54
13.5. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST
LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST LINE 1-L
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 46 of 54
Line Conducted Emission Test Line 2-N
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 47 of 54
APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP
FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST SETUP
FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 48 of 54
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 49 of 54
APPENDIX B: PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT
TOTAL VIEW OF EUT
THE LABEL OF ADAPTER
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 50 of 54
THE LABEL OF BATTERY
TOP VIEW OF EUT
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 51 of 54
BOTTOM VIEW OF EUT
FRONT VIEW OF EUT
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 52 of 54
BACK VIEW OF EUT
LEFT VIEW OF EUT
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 53 of 54
RIGHT VIEW OF EUT
OPEN VIEW OF EUT-1
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 54 of 54
OPEN VIEW OF EUT-2
INTERNAL VIEW OF EUT-1
WIFI
Antenna
GSM/WCDMA
Antenna
Report No.: AGC08611161101FE04
Page 55 of 54
INTERNAL VIEW OF EUT-2
----END OF REPORT----
Download: PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Mirror Download [FCC.gov]PHGW Smart Security Alarm System-Gateway Test Report EMC COMPLIANCE Shenzhen Patrol Hawk Technology Co., Ltd.
Document ID3251409
Application IDrOeRuecRLDlEuOOYfVZpGg==
Document Description14_PH-GW TestRpt DTS
Short Term ConfidentialNo
Permanent ConfidentialNo
SupercedeNo
Document TypeTest Report
Display FormatAdobe Acrobat PDF - pdf
Filesize300.32kB (3754048 bits)
Date Submitted2017-01-09 00:00:00
Date Available2017-01-09 00:00:00
Creation Date2016-12-28 12:24:15
Producing SoftwareMicrosoft® Office Word 2007
Document Lastmod2016-12-29 10:31:41
Document TitleEMC COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT
Document CreatorMicrosoft® Office Word 2007
Document Author: Simon

Source Exif Data [exif.tools]:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.6
Linearized                      : No
Tagged PDF                      : Yes
XMP Toolkit                     : 3.1-701
Create Date                     : 2016:12:28 12:24:15Z
Creator Tool                    : Microsoft® Office Word 2007
Modify Date                     : 2016:12:29 10:31:41+08:00
Metadata Date                   : 2016:12:29 10:31:41+08:00
Format                          : application/pdf
Creator                         : Simon
Title                           : EMC COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT
Producer                        : Microsoft® Office Word 2007
Document ID                     : uuid:e9647533-639a-4025-84e8-a71d8ebf4b52
Instance ID                     : uuid:750415d2-a1bf-4782-8719-8150ad6734a7
Page Count                      : 55
Language                        : zh-CN
Author                          : Simon