WAPN008 MOXA IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n Cover Letter WAPN008- Reply to an OET Inquiry Response_20180809 Moxa Inc.

Moxa Inc. MOXA IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n

Page 1 of WAPN008 MOXA IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n Cover Letter WAPN008- Reply to an OET Inquiry Response_20180809 Moxa Inc.
Page 2 of WAPN008 MOXA IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n Cover Letter WAPN008- Reply to an OET Inquiry Response_20180809 Moxa Inc.
Page 3 of WAPN008 MOXA IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n Cover Letter WAPN008- Reply to an OET Inquiry Response_20180809 Moxa Inc.

Reply to an OET Inquiry Response
Currently Displaying Inquiry Tracking Number: 852212
Inquiry: Dear FCC,
There is a certified module will be installed in the 3 hosts and enabled the DFS Master function.
For the master function, the DFS test and PAG procedure will be required then.
However, there are a bit differences on the mainboard (not the RF module) as attached.
As you can see the attached pdf file, the differences of the host AWK-3131-M12-RCC, AWK-3131-M12-RTG and AWK-3131A-SSC-RTG are listed.
After evaluation, we think AWK-3131-M12-RCC is required full DFS test, and we will do partial check for AWK-3131A-SSC-RTG. Is it acceptable to evaluate
in this way due to the small difference on the mainboard, or full DFS test for the three hosts are required?
We need to have your response and confirmation to proceed the following. Thank you.
BR
Valentina
FCC Response on 07/23/2018:
What is the FCC ID of the certified module?
---Reply from Customer on 07/23/2018--Dear FCC,
The FCC ID of the certified module is SLE-WAPN008.
Thank you.
BR
Valentina
FCC Response on 07/25/2018:
Is the software/firmware identical for all 3 devices?
---Reply from Customer on 07/25/2018--Dear FCC,
Exactly. The software and firmware is identical.
BR
Valentina
FCC Response on 07/25/2018:
Your test plan is acceptable as long as all 3 models are getting the same FCC ID and all have the same antenna(s).
---Reply from Customer on 08/08/2018--Dear FCC,
After confirmation, the SW and FW version of the first model, AWK-3131-M12-RCC is different from the other two hosts since AWK-3131-M12-RCC supports
additional giga LAN function.
In this condition, is our test plan still acceptable?
Attached the updated file for your reference. Thank you.
BR
Valentina
FCC Response on 08/08/2018:
It is still acceptable. However, the differences will need to be identified prominently and clearly in the filing.
Download: WAPN008 MOXA IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n Cover Letter WAPN008- Reply to an OET Inquiry Response_20180809 Moxa Inc.
Mirror Download [FCC.gov]WAPN008 MOXA IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n Cover Letter WAPN008- Reply to an OET Inquiry Response_20180809 Moxa Inc.
Document ID4004098
Application ID3mnsxGi1o3N1B/Bb9BmEcQ==
Document DescriptionWAPN008- Reply to an OET Inquiry Response_20180809
Short Term ConfidentialNo
Permanent ConfidentialNo
SupercedeNo
Document TypeCover Letter(s)
Display FormatAdobe Acrobat PDF - pdf
Filesize21.57kB (269685 bits)
Date Submitted2018-09-13 00:00:00
Date Available2018-09-19 00:00:00
Creation Date2018-08-09 10:37:09
Producing SoftwareMicrosoft® Word 2010
Document Lastmod2018-08-09 10:37:09
Document TitleWAPN008- Reply to an OET Inquiry Response_20180809
Document CreatorMicrosoft® Word 2010
Document Author: valentina.wu

Source Exif Data [exif.tools]:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.5
Linearized                      : No
Page Count                      : 3
Language                        : zh-TW
Tagged PDF                      : Yes
Author                          : valentina.wu
Creator                         : Microsoft® Word 2010
Create Date                     : 2018:08:09 10:37:09+08:00
Modify Date                     : 2018:08:09 10:37:09+08:00
Producer                        : Microsoft® Word 2010