News

Stakeholders Back FCC Action on Device Test Lab Onshoring and Reciprocity Rules

The FCC announced an upcoming vote on final rules governing electronic device testing, limiting recognition to laboratories located in the United States or countries offering reciprocal recognition.

An illustration depicting two stylized buildings, one on the left and one on the right, representing test laboratories. Each building has subtle radio wave motifs emanating from it. In the center, a shield icon symbolizes regulation and protection, with document icons layered on it, suggesting compliance and official rules. Connecting the buildings and the central shield are abstract network lines and glowing nodes, indicating data flow and interconnectedness. Below this central arrangement, a dotted world map is visible, with a highlighted area (possibly representing the U.S. or a reciprocal country) and a document icon next to it, further emphasizing the international and regulatory aspects. The color palette is dominated by navy and blue, with acc
Editorial illustration. It does not depict the regulated device.

FCC Rules on Test Lab Recognition and Reciprocity

On October 27, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission announced a scheduled vote on final rules that alter the regulatory regime governing the testing and certification of electronic devices used by consumers in the United States.

Under the final rules, the FCC will limit its recognition of device test laboratories to those operating within the United States or in nations that grant reciprocal recognition to U.S. test laboratories.

Industry and Policy Stakeholder Reactions

A wide range of industry representatives, testing organizations, and policy institutes issued statements regarding the Commission's pending order and its impact on equipment authorization, supply chains, and domestic testing capacity.

  • American Compass: Chief Economist Oren Cass stated that the FCC's action addresses reliance on China for testing electronics destined for the U.S. market and will improve domestic research, development, and production of communications technology.
  • America First Policy Institute: Senior Director Piero Tozzi highlighted concerns regarding foreign intelligence laws that can compel firms to disclose nonpublic technical data and trade secrets prior to market entry.
  • Bull Moose Project: President Aiden Buzetti supported Chairman Carr's focus on reciprocity, noting that fewer than 4% of electronics are currently tested on American soil.
  • Compliance Testing LLC: CEO Michael Schafer noted that the order safeguards electronics via trusted domestic test labs and referenced actions taken against their Shenzhen entity by the China Ministry of Commerce.
  • Digital First Project: Executive Director Nathan Leamer stated that requiring testing to occur in the U.S. or reciprocal countries will enhance network integrity and rebuild domestic testing capacity.
  • Digital Progress Institute: President Joel Thayer stated the rules will halt one-way market access where Chinese labs certified U.S. equipment without reciprocal rights for U.S. labs.
  • Element Materials Technology: Randy J. Ortanez, VP of Cellular and Wireless Testing, welcomed the focus on integrity, security, technical competence, and reciprocity within the global conformity framework.
  • Exiger: Kit Conklin, Chief Strategy & Global Affairs Officer, stated the measure helps protect technology supply chains and reduces national security risks.
  • Foundation for American Innovation: Josh Levine, Director of Tech and Statecraft, remarked that the order ends reliance on adversary-controlled infrastructure in testing.
  • Foundation for Defense of Democracies: Rear Admiral (Ret.) Mark Montgomery and Senior Director Craig Singleton emphasized that ending recognition for non-reciprocal foreign labs strengthens the gatekeeping role for technology supply chains.
  • International Center for Law and Economics: Kristian Stout, Director of Innovation Policy, stated that the FCC lacks direct enforcement authority over labs in non-reciprocal jurisdictions, making reciprocal agreements vital for regulatory compliance.
  • Meter: Regulatory representative Saied Haddad stated that establishing strict testing and certification authority standards will increase product integrity.
  • National Security Institute: Senior Fellow Andy Keiser stated that in 2025, fewer than four percent of devices seeking FCC authorization were tested in U.S. labs, making reciprocity essential for network security.
  • New American Industrial Alliance: Emphasized that recognizing only domestic or reciprocal foreign labs will return testing jobs to the United States.
  • Telecommunications Industry Association: Senior Director Colin Andrews supported the order and noted the adoption of a two-year transition period alongside ongoing monitoring of testing capacity.

Source documents

This article is based on an official Federal Communications Commission publication released October 27, 2026.

FCC release date: 2026-10-27.