V200CP Point of Sale Terminal Test Report DFS VeriFone Inc
VeriFone Inc Point of Sale Terminal
FCC ID
>
V200CP
>
FCC ID Filing: B32V200CP
Purchase on Amazon:
Point of Sale Terminal
Trouble Viewing? See the or view the HTML Version or PDF in frame
DFS Test Report Report No.: RF171114C19-1 FCC ID: B32V200CP Model Name: V400c Plus Series Model: V400c Received Date: Nov. 15, 2017 Test Date: Dec. 14, 2017 Issued Date: Dec. 15, 2017 Applicant: VERIFONE SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. TAIWAN BRANCH Address: 2F., 19-2, SANCHUNG ROAD, NANKANG DIST., TAIPEI, TAIWAN 115, R.O.C. Issued By: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lab Address: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan Test Location: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd., Wen Hwa Vil., Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City 33383, TAIWAN (R.O.C.) FCC Registration / 788550 / TW0003 Designation Number: This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 1 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 Table of Contents Release Control Record .................................................................................................................................. 3 Certificate of Conformity ...................................................................................................................... 4 EUT Information .................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 3. Operating Frequency Bands and Mode of EUT .................................................................................. 5 EUT Hardware, Software and Firmware Version ................................................................................ 5 Description of Available Antennas to the EUT .................................................................................... 5 EUT Maximum Conducted Power ....................................................................................................... 6 EUT Maximum E.I.R.P. Power ............................................................................................................ 7 Transmit Power Control (TPC) ............................................................................................................ 8 Statement of Maunfacturer .................................................................................................................. 8 U-NII DFS Rule Requirements ............................................................................................................. 9 3.1 3.2 4. Working Modes and Required Test Items ........................................................................................... 9 Test Limits and Radar Signal Parameters ......................................................................................... 10 Test & Support Equipment List ......................................................................................................... 13 4.1 4.2 5. Test Instruments ................................................................................................................................ 13 Description of Support Units ............................................................................................................. 13 Test Procedure .................................................................................................................................... 14 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.4.1 6. Test Results ......................................................................................................................................... 17 6.1 6.2 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.5 7. DFS Measurement System ............................................................................................................... 14 Calibration of DFS Detection Threshold Level .................................................................................. 15 Deviation from Test Standard ............................................................................................................ 16 Radiated Test Setup Configuration ................................................................................................... 16 Client without Radar Detection Mode ................................................................................................ 16 Summary of Test Results .................................................................................................................. 17 Test Results ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Test Mode: Device Operating In Client without Radar Detection Mode. ........................................... 18 Channel Closing Transmission and Channel Move Time .................................................................. 19 Non-Occupancy Period ..................................................................................................................... 21 Non-Associated Test .......................................................................................................................... 22 Non-Co-Channel Test ........................................................................................................................ 22 Information on the Testing Laboratories .......................................................................................... 23 Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 2 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 Release Control Record Issue No. Description Date Issued RF171114C19-1 Original release. Dec. 15, 2017 Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 3 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 1 Certificate of Conformity Product: Point of Sale Terminal Brand: Verifone Model Name: V400c Plus Series Model: V400c Sample Status: Identical Prototype Applicant: VERIFONE SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. TAIWAN BRANCH Test Date: Dec. 14, 2017 Standards: FCC Part 15, Subpart E (Section 15.407) 905462 D02 UNII DFS Compliance Procedures New Rules v02 905462 D03 UNII Clients Without Radar Detection New Rules v01r02 The above equipment has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. Prepared by : Date: Dec. 15, 2017 Date: Dec. 15, 2017 Alice Ho / Specialist Approved by : Ken Liu / Senior Manager Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 4 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 2 EUT Information 2.1 Operating Frequency Bands and Mode of EUT TABLE 1: Operating Frequency Bands and Mode of EUT Operating Frequency Range Operational Mode 5250~5350MHz 5470~5725MHz Client without radar detection and ad hoc function 2.2 EUT Hardware, Software and Firmware Version Table 2: The EUT Hardware/Software/Firmware Version No. Product Model No. Series Model Hardware/Software/Firmware Version Point of Sale Terminal V400c Plus V400c release-30810401 Note: All models are listed as below. Model: V400c = Sku A = Standard version = RFID only Model: V400c Plus = Sku B = Media version = RFID + BT/WIFI 2.3 Description of Available Antennas to the EUT Table 3: Antenna List ANT No. Antenna Type Operation Frequency Range (MHz) Gain (dBi) PIFA 5250-5350 MHz 2.41 PIFA 5470-5725 MHz 2.96 Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 5 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 2.4 EUT Maximum Conducted Power Table 4: The Measured Conducted Output Power 802.11a MAX. Power ANT No. Frequency Band (MHz) Output Power(dBm) Output Power(mW) 5250~5350 10.8 12.023 5470~5725 10.75 11.885 802.11n HT20 MAX. Power ANT No. Frequency Band (MHz) Output Power(dBm) Output Power(mW) 5250~5350 10.83 12.106 5470~5725 10.66 11.641 802.11n HT40 MAX. Power ANT No. Frequency Band (MHz) Output Power(dBm) Output Power(mW) 5250~5350 11.04 12.706 5470~5725 10.86 12.19 Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 6 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 2.5 EUT Maximum E.I.R.P. Power Table 5: The EIRP Output Power List 802.11a MAX. Power ANT No. Frequency Band (MHz) Output Power(dBm) Output Power(mW) 5250~5350 13.21 20.941 5470~5725 13.71 23.496 802.11n HT20 MAX. Power ANT No. Frequency Band (MHz) Output Power(dBm) Output Power(mW) 5250~5350 13.24 21.086 5470~5725 13.62 23.014 802.11n HT40 MAX. Power ANT No. Frequency Band (MHz) Output Power(dBm) Output Power(mW) 5250~5350 13.45 22.131 5470~5725 13.82 24.099 Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 7 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 2.6 Transmit Power Control (TPC) U-NII devices operating in the 5.25-5.35 GHz band and the 5.47-5.725 GHz band shall employ a TPC mechanism. The U-NII device is required to have the capability to operate at least 6 dB below the mean EIRP value of 30 dBm. A TPC mechanism is not required for systems with an e.i.r.p. of less than 500 mW. Maximum EIRP of this device is 24.099 mW which less than 500mW, therefore it’s not require TPC function. 2.7 Statement of Maunfacturer Manufacturer statement confirming that information regarding the parameters of the detected Radar Waveforms is not available to the end user. And the device doesn’t have Ad Hoc mode on DFS frequency band. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 8 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 3. U-NII DFS Rule Requirements 3.1 Working Modes and Required Test Items The manufacturer shall state whether the UUT is capable of operating as a Master and/or a Client. If the UUT is capable of operating in more than one operating mode then each operating mode shall be tested separately. See tables 6 and 7 for the applicability of DFS requirements for each of the operational modes. Table 6: Applicability of DFS Requirements Prior To Use a Channel Operational Mode Requirement Master Client without radar detection Client with radar detection Non-Occupancy Period Not required DFS Detection Threshold Not required Channel Availability Check Time Not required Not required U-NII Detection Bandwidth Not required Note: Regarding KDB 905462 D03 Client Without DFS New Rules v01r02 section (b)(5/6), If the client moves with the master, the device is considered compliant if nothing appears in the client non-occupancy period test. For devices that shut down (rather than moving channels), no beacons should appear. An analyzer plot that contains a single 30-minute sweep on the original channel. Table 7: Applicability of DFS Requirements during Normal Operation. Operational Mode Requirement Master or Client with radar detection Client without radar detection DFS Detection Threshold Not required Channel Closing Transmission Time Channel Move Time U-NII Detection Bandwidth Not required Additional requirements for devices with multiple bandwidth modes Master or Client with radar detection Client without radar detection U-NII Detection Bandwidth and Statistical Performance Check All BW modes must be tested Not required Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time Test using widest BW mode available Test using the widest BW mode available for the link All other tests Any single BW mode Not required Note: Frequencies selected for statistical performance check (Section 7.8.4) should include several frequencies within the radar detection bandwidth and frequencies near the edge of the radar detection bandwidth. For 802.11 devices it is suggested to select frequencies in each of the bonded 20 MHz channels and the channel center frequency. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 9 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 3.2 Test Limits and Radar Signal Parameters Detection Threshold Values Table 8: DFS Detection Thresholds for Master Devices And Client Devices With Radar Detection Value (See Notes 1, 2, and 3) -64 dBm Maximum Transmit Power EIRP ≥ 200 milliwatt EIRP < 200 milliwatt and -62 dBm power spectral density < 10 dBm/MHz EIRP < 200 milliwatt that do not meet the -64 dBm power spectral density requirement Note 1: This is the level at the input of the receiver assuming a 0 dBi receive antenna. Note 2: Throughout these test procedures an additional 1 dB has been added to the amplitude of the test transmission waveforms to account for variations in measurement equipment. This will ensure that the test signal is at or above the detection threshold level to trigger a DFS response. Note3: EIRP is based on the highest antenna gain. For MIMO devices refer to KDB Publication 662911 D01. Table 9: DFS Response Requirement Values Parameter Value Non-occupancy period Channel Availability Check Time Minimum 30 minutes 60 seconds 10 seconds Channel Move Time See Note 1. 200 milliseconds + an aggregate of 60 Channel Closing Transmission Time milliseconds over remaining 10 second period. See Notes 1 and 2. Minimum 100% of the U-NII 99% transmission U-NII Detection Bandwidth power bandwidth. See Note 3 Note 1: Channel Move Time and the Channel Closing Transmission Time should be performed with Radar Type 0. The measurement timing begins at the end of the Radar Type 0 burst. Note 2: The Channel Closing Transmission Time is comprised of 200 milliseconds starting at the beginning of the Channel Move Time plus any additional intermittent control signals required to facilitate a Channel move (an aggregate of 60 milliseconds) during the remainder of the 10 second period. The aggregate duration of control signals will not count quiet periods in between transmissions. Note 3: During the U-NII Detection Bandwidth detection test, radar type 0 should be used. For each frequency step the minimum percentage of detection is 90 percent. Measurements are performed with no data traffic. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 10 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 Parameters of DFS Test Signals Step intervals of 0.1 microsecond for Pulse Width, 1 microsecond for PRI, 1 MHz for chirp width and 1 for the number of pulses will be utilized for the random determination of specific test waveforms. Table 10: Short Pulse Radar Test Waveforms Radar Type Pulse Width (µsec) PRI (µsec) Number of Pulses Minimum Percentage of Successful Detection Minimum Number of Trials 1428 18 See Note 1 See Note 1 Test A: 15 unique PRI values randomly selected from the list of 23 PRI values in Table 5a 60% 30 1 . 360 Roundup 19 ∙ 10 PRIμ sec Test B: 15 unique PRI values randomly selected within the range of 518-3066μ sec, with a minimum increment of 1μ sec, excluding PRI values selected in Test A 1-5 150-230 23-29 60% 30 6-10 200-500 16-18 60% 30 11-20 200-500 12-16 60% 30 Aggregate (Radar Types 1-4) 80% 120 Note 1: Short Pulse Radar Type 0 should be used for the detection bandwidth test, channel move time, and channel closing time tests. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 11 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 Table 11: Long Pulse Radar Test Waveform Radar Type Pulse Width (µsec) Chirp Width (MHz) PRI (µsec) 50-100 5-20 1000-2000 Number Of Number Of Pulses Per Bursts Burst 1-3 8-20 Minimum Percentage Of Successful Detection Minimum Number Of Trials 80% 30 Three subsets of trials will be performed with a minimum of ten trials per subset. The subset of trials differ in where the Long Pulse Type 5 Signal is tuned in frequency. a) the Channel center frequency b) tuned frequencies such that 90% of the Long Pulse Type 5 frequency modulation is within the low edge of the UUT Occupied Bandwidth c) tuned frequencies such that 90% of the Long Pulse Type 5 frequency modulation is within the high edge of the UUT Occupied Bandwidth It include 10 trails for every subset, the formula as below, For subset case 1: the center frequency of the signal generator will remain fixed at the center of the UUT Channel. For subset case 2: to retain 90% frequency overlap between the radar signal and the UUT Occupied Bandwidth, the center frequency of the signal generator will vary for each of the ten trials in subset case 2. The center frequency of the signal generator for each trial is calculated by: +(0.4∗ ℎ ℎ[ ]) For subset case 3: to retain 90% frequency overlap between the radar signal and the UUT Occupied Bandwidth, the center frequency of the signal generator will vary for each of the ten trials in subset case 3. The center frequency of the signal generator for each trial is calculated by: −(0.4∗ ℎ ℎ[ ]) Table 12: Frequency Hopping Radar Test Waveform Radar Type Pulse Width (µsec) PRI (µsec) Pulses per Hop Hopping Rate (kHz) Hopping Sequence Length (msec) Minimum Percentage Of Successful Detection Minimum Number Of Trials 333 0.333 300 70% 30 Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 12 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 4. Test & Support Equipment List 4.1 Test Instruments Table 13: Test Instruments List Date Of Due Date Of Calibration Calibration Description & Manufacturer Model No. Brand R&S Spectrum analyzer ESR R&S 2017/02/20 2018/02/19 Signal generator Horn antenna 8645A BBHA 9120 D CA3501-3501-G.90(3m) & CA3501-3501-F.90(2m) Agilent Schwarzbeck 2017/08/11 2016/12/28 2018/08/10 2017/12/27 INFINET 2017/08/21 2018/08/20 RF coaxial cable 4.2 Description of Support Units Table 14: Support Unit Information. No. Product Brand Model No. Router NETGEAR NOTE: This device was functioned as a R7800 Master FCC ID Spec. PY315100319 5G Ant gain : 1.61dBi Maximum EIRP : 25.47dBm Slave device during the DFS test. Table 15: Software/Firmware Information. No. Product Router Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Model No. R7800 Page No. 13 / 23 Software/Firmware Version V1.0.1.30 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 5. Test Procedure 5.1 DFS Measurement System A complete DFS Measurement System consists of two subsystems: (1) the Radar Signal Generating Subsystem and (2) the Traffic Monitoring Subsystem. The control PC is necessary for generating the Radar waveforms in Table 10, 11 and 12. The traffic monitoring subsystem is specified to the type of unit under test (UUT). Radiated Setup Configuration of DFS Measurement System System testing will be performed with channel-loading using means appropriate to the data types that are used by the unlicensed device. The following requirements apply: a) The data file must be of a type that is typical for the device (i.e., MPEG-2, MPEG-4, WAV, MP3, MP4, AVI, etc.) and must generally be transmitting in a streaming mode. b) Software to ping the client is permitted to simulate data transfer but must have random ping intervals. c) Timing plots are required with calculations demonstrating a minimum channel loading of approximately 17% or greater. d) Unicast or Multicast protocols are preferable but other protocols may be used. The appropriate protocol used must be described in the test procedures. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 14 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 Wireless Traffic Loading Traffic Signal Noise Floor 5.2 Calibration of DFS Detection Threshold Level The measured channel is 5500MHz and 5510MHz. The radar signal was the same as transmitted channels, and injected into the antenna of AP (master) or Client Device with Radar Detection, measured the channel closing transmission time and channel move time. The calibrated detection threshold level is set to -64dBm. The tested level is lower than required level hence it provides margin to the limit. Radiated setup configuration of Calibration of DFS Detection Threshold Level Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 15 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 5.3 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 5.4 Radiated Test Setup Configuration 5.4.1 Client without Radar Detection Mode The UUT is a U-NII Device operating in Client mode without radar detection. The radar test signals are injected into the Master Device. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 16 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 6. Test Results 6.1 Summary of Test Results Clause Test Parameter Remarks Pass/Fail 15.407 DFS Detection Threshold Not Applicable NA 15.407 Channel Availability Check Time Not Applicable NA 15.407 Channel Move Time Applicable Pass 15.407 Channel Closing Transmission Time Applicable Pass 15.407 Non-Occupancy Period Applicable Pass 15.407 Uniform Spreading Not Applicable NA 15.407 U-NII Detection Bandwidth Not Applicable NA 15.407 Non-associated test Applicable Pass 15.407 Non-Co-Channel test Applicable Pass Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 17 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 6.2 Test Results 6.2.1 Test Mode: Device Operating In Client without Radar Detection Mode. Client with injection at the Master. (The radar test signals are injected into the Master Device) DFS Detection Threshold For a detection threshold level of -64dBm, the required signal strength at EUT antenna location is -64dBm. The tested level is lower than required level hence it provides margin to the limit. Radar signal Noise Floor Date: 23.MAR.2015 Report No.: RF171114C19-4 14:53:55 Radar Signal 0 Page No. 18 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 6.2.2 Channel Closing Transmission and Channel Move Time Radar Signal 0 802.11n HT20 Radar Signal Traffic Signal Noise Floor NOTE: T1 denotes the start of Channel Move Time upon the end of the last Radar burst. T2 denotes the data transmission time of 200ms from T1. T3 denotes the end of Channel Move Time.T4 denotes the 10 second from T1 to observe the aggregate duration of transmissions. Radar Signal Noise Floor NOTE: An expanded plot for the device vacates the channel in the required 500ms. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 19 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 Radar Signal 0 802.11n HT40 Radar Signal Traffic Signal Noise Floor NOTE: T1 denotes the start of Channel Move Time upon the end of the last Radar burst. T2 denotes the data transmission time of 200ms from T1. T3 denotes the end of Channel Move Time.T4 denotes the 10 second from T1 to observe the aggregate duration of transmissions. Radar Signal Noise Floor NOTE: An expanded plot for the device vacates the channel in the required 500ms. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 20 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 6.2.3 Non-Occupancy Period Associate test: During the 30 minutes observation time, UUT did not make any transmissions on a channel after a radar signal was detected on that channel by either the Channel Availability Check or the In-Service Monitoring. 1) EUT (Client) links with master on 5500MHz. Waveform of EUT links up with Master Date: 23.MAR.2015 16:27:51 2) Client plays specified files via master. Waveform of transmission Date: 23.MAR.2015 Report No.: RF171114C19-4 16:29:21 Page No. 21 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 3) Radar signal 0 is applied to the Master device and WiFi traffic signal stop immediately. Radar signal applied to the master and traffic stopped as described in section 6.2.2. 4) 5500MHz has been monitored in 30 minutes period. In this period, no any transmission occurs. Plot of 30minutes period 802.11n HT20 Traffic Signal Injected into Radar Noise Floor NOTE: Test setup are shown on Test set up photo.pdf 6.2.4 Non-Associated Test Master was off. During the 30 minutes observation time, The UUT did not make any transmissions in the DFS band after UUT power up. Noise Floor 6.2.5 Non-Co-Channel Test The UUT was investigated after radar was detected and confirmed that no co-channel operation with radars. Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 22 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2 7. Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are FCC recognized accredited test firms and accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following: Linko EMC/RF Lab Hsin Chu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab Tel: 886-2-26052180 Tel: 886-3-6668565 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Fax: 886-3-6668323 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Lab Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3270892 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also. --- END --- Report No.: RF171114C19-4 Page No. 23 / 23 Report Format Version: 6.1.2
Source Exif Data:
File Type : PDF File Type Extension : pdf MIME Type : application/pdf PDF Version : 1.6 Linearized : No Create Date : 2017:12:25 09:13:17+08:00 Creator : Microsoft® Office Word 2007 Modify Date : 2017:12:25 09:13:33+08:00 Language : zh-TW XMP Toolkit : Adobe XMP Core 5.4-c005 78.147326, 2012/08/23-13:03:03 Creator Tool : Microsoft® Office Word 2007 Metadata Date : 2017:12:25 09:13:33+08:00 Producer : Microsoft® Office Word 2007 Format : application/pdf Document ID : uuid:8a497938-cceb-4048-885e-84fdd9e3e0fd Instance ID : uuid:444661a5-fabf-4959-b307-31f7fe76641a Page Count : 23EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools