V200CP Point of Sale Terminal Test Report DFS VeriFone Inc

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

DFS Test Report
Report No.: RF171114C19-1
FCC ID: B32V200CP
Model Name: V400c Plus
Series Model: V400c
Received Date: Nov. 15, 2017
Test Date: Dec. 14, 2017
Issued Date: Dec. 15, 2017
Applicant: VERIFONE SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. TAIWAN BRANCH
Address: 2F., 19-2, SANCHUNG ROAD, NANKANG DIST., TAIPEI, TAIWAN 115,
R.O.C.
Issued By: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch
Lab Address: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan
Test Location: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd., Wen Hwa Vil., Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City
33383, TAIWAN (R.O.C.)
FCC Registration / 788550 / TW0003
Designation Number:
This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted
only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this
report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product
unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you
provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided,
however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time
shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific
mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. The report
must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 1 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
Table of Contents
Release Control Record .................................................................................................................................. 3
Certificate of Conformity ...................................................................................................................... 4
EUT Information .................................................................................................................................... 5
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
3.
Operating Frequency Bands and Mode of EUT .................................................................................. 5
EUT Hardware, Software and Firmware Version ................................................................................ 5
Description of Available Antennas to the EUT .................................................................................... 5
EUT Maximum Conducted Power ....................................................................................................... 6
EUT Maximum E.I.R.P. Power ............................................................................................................ 7
Transmit Power Control (TPC) ............................................................................................................ 8
Statement of Maunfacturer .................................................................................................................. 8
U-NII DFS Rule Requirements ............................................................................................................. 9
3.1
3.2
4.
Working Modes and Required Test Items ........................................................................................... 9
Test Limits and Radar Signal Parameters ......................................................................................... 10
Test & Support Equipment List ......................................................................................................... 13
4.1
4.2
5.
Test Instruments ................................................................................................................................ 13
Description of Support Units ............................................................................................................. 13
Test Procedure .................................................................................................................................... 14
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.4.1
6.
Test Results ......................................................................................................................................... 17
6.1
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.2.4
6.2.5
7.
DFS Measurement System ............................................................................................................... 14
Calibration of DFS Detection Threshold Level .................................................................................. 15
Deviation from Test Standard ............................................................................................................ 16
Radiated Test Setup Configuration ................................................................................................... 16
Client without Radar Detection Mode ................................................................................................ 16
Summary of Test Results .................................................................................................................. 17
Test Results ....................................................................................................................................... 18
Test Mode: Device Operating In Client without Radar Detection Mode. ........................................... 18
Channel Closing Transmission and Channel Move Time .................................................................. 19
Non-Occupancy Period ..................................................................................................................... 21
Non-Associated Test .......................................................................................................................... 22
Non-Co-Channel Test ........................................................................................................................ 22
Information on the Testing Laboratories .......................................................................................... 23
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 2 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
Release Control Record
Issue No.
Description
Date Issued
RF171114C19-1
Original release.
Dec. 15, 2017
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 3 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
1
Certificate of Conformity
Product: Point of Sale Terminal
Brand: Verifone
Model Name: V400c Plus
Series Model: V400c
Sample Status: Identical Prototype
Applicant: VERIFONE SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. TAIWAN BRANCH
Test Date: Dec. 14, 2017
Standards: FCC Part 15, Subpart E (Section 15.407)
905462 D02 UNII DFS Compliance Procedures New Rules v02
905462 D03 UNII Clients Without Radar Detection New Rules v01r02
The above equipment has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd.,
Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data
evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts
of the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report.
Prepared by :
Date:
Dec. 15, 2017
Date:
Dec. 15, 2017
Alice Ho / Specialist
Approved by :
Ken Liu / Senior Manager
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 4 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
2
EUT Information
2.1
Operating Frequency Bands and Mode of EUT
TABLE 1: Operating Frequency Bands and Mode of EUT
Operating Frequency Range
Operational Mode
5250~5350MHz
5470~5725MHz


Client without radar detection and ad
hoc function
2.2
EUT Hardware, Software and Firmware Version
Table 2: The EUT Hardware/Software/Firmware Version
No.
Product
Model No.
Series
Model
Hardware/Software/Firmware
Version
Point of Sale Terminal
V400c Plus
V400c
release-30810401
Note: All models are listed as below.
Model: V400c = Sku A = Standard version = RFID only
Model: V400c Plus = Sku B = Media version = RFID + BT/WIFI
2.3
Description of Available Antennas to the EUT
Table 3: Antenna List
ANT No.
Antenna Type
Operation Frequency
Range (MHz)
Gain (dBi)
PIFA
5250-5350 MHz
2.41
PIFA
5470-5725 MHz
2.96
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 5 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
2.4
EUT Maximum Conducted Power
Table 4: The Measured Conducted Output Power
802.11a
MAX. Power
ANT No.
Frequency Band (MHz)
Output Power(dBm)
Output Power(mW)
5250~5350
10.8
12.023
5470~5725
10.75
11.885
802.11n HT20
MAX. Power
ANT No.
Frequency Band (MHz)
Output Power(dBm)
Output Power(mW)
5250~5350
10.83
12.106
5470~5725
10.66
11.641
802.11n HT40
MAX. Power
ANT No.
Frequency Band (MHz)
Output Power(dBm)
Output Power(mW)
5250~5350
11.04
12.706
5470~5725
10.86
12.19
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 6 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
2.5
EUT Maximum E.I.R.P. Power
Table 5: The EIRP Output Power List
802.11a
MAX. Power
ANT No.
Frequency Band (MHz)
Output Power(dBm)
Output Power(mW)
5250~5350
13.21
20.941
5470~5725
13.71
23.496
802.11n HT20
MAX. Power
ANT No.
Frequency Band (MHz)
Output Power(dBm)
Output Power(mW)
5250~5350
13.24
21.086
5470~5725
13.62
23.014
802.11n HT40
MAX. Power
ANT No.
Frequency Band (MHz)
Output Power(dBm)
Output Power(mW)
5250~5350
13.45
22.131
5470~5725
13.82
24.099
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 7 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
2.6
Transmit Power Control (TPC)
U-NII devices operating in the 5.25-5.35 GHz band and the 5.47-5.725 GHz band shall employ a TPC
mechanism. The U-NII device is required to have the capability to operate at least 6 dB below the mean EIRP
value of 30 dBm. A TPC mechanism is not required for systems with an e.i.r.p. of less than 500 mW.
Maximum EIRP of this device is 24.099 mW which less than 500mW, therefore it’s not require TPC function.
2.7
Statement of Maunfacturer
Manufacturer statement confirming that information regarding the parameters of the detected Radar
Waveforms is not available to the end user. And the device doesn’t have Ad Hoc mode on DFS frequency
band.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 8 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
3. U-NII DFS Rule Requirements
3.1
Working Modes and Required Test Items
The manufacturer shall state whether the UUT is capable of operating as a Master and/or a Client. If the UUT
is capable of operating in more than one operating mode then each operating mode shall be tested separately.
See tables 6 and 7 for the applicability of DFS requirements for each of the operational modes.
Table 6: Applicability of DFS Requirements Prior To Use a Channel
Operational Mode
Requirement
Master
Client without radar
detection
Client with radar
detection
Non-Occupancy Period

Not required

DFS Detection Threshold

Not required

Channel Availability Check Time

Not required
Not required
U-NII Detection Bandwidth

Not required

Note: Regarding KDB 905462 D03 Client Without DFS New Rules v01r02 section (b)(5/6),
If the client moves with the master, the device is considered compliant if nothing appears in the client
non-occupancy period test. For devices that shut down (rather than moving channels), no beacons
should appear. An analyzer plot that contains a single 30-minute sweep on the original channel.
Table 7: Applicability of DFS Requirements during Normal Operation.
Operational Mode
Requirement
Master or Client with
radar detection
Client without radar
detection
DFS Detection Threshold

Not required
Channel Closing Transmission Time


Channel Move Time


U-NII Detection Bandwidth

Not required
Additional requirements for devices
with multiple bandwidth modes
Master or Client with
radar detection
Client without radar
detection
U-NII Detection Bandwidth and Statistical
Performance Check
All BW modes must be
tested
Not required
Channel Move Time and Channel Closing
Transmission Time
Test using widest BW
mode available
Test using the widest BW
mode available for the link
All other tests
Any single BW mode
Not required
Note: Frequencies selected for statistical performance check (Section 7.8.4) should include several
frequencies within the radar detection bandwidth and frequencies near the edge of the radar
detection bandwidth. For 802.11 devices it is suggested to select frequencies in each of the bonded
20 MHz channels and the channel center frequency.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 9 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
3.2
Test Limits and Radar Signal Parameters
Detection Threshold Values
Table 8: DFS Detection Thresholds for Master Devices And Client Devices With Radar Detection
Value
(See Notes 1, 2, and 3)
-64 dBm
Maximum Transmit Power
EIRP ≥ 200 milliwatt
EIRP < 200 milliwatt and
-62 dBm
power spectral density < 10 dBm/MHz
EIRP < 200 milliwatt that do not meet the
-64 dBm
power spectral density requirement
Note 1: This is the level at the input of the receiver assuming a 0 dBi receive antenna.
Note 2: Throughout these test procedures an additional 1 dB has been added to the amplitude of the
test transmission waveforms to account for variations in measurement equipment. This will ensure
that the test signal is at or above the detection threshold level to trigger a DFS response.
Note3: EIRP is based on the highest antenna gain. For MIMO devices refer to KDB Publication
662911 D01.
Table 9: DFS Response Requirement Values
Parameter
Value
Non-occupancy period
Channel Availability Check Time
Minimum 30 minutes
60 seconds
10 seconds
Channel Move Time
See Note 1.
200 milliseconds + an aggregate of 60
Channel Closing Transmission Time
milliseconds over remaining 10 second period.
See Notes 1 and 2.
Minimum 100% of the U-NII 99% transmission
U-NII Detection Bandwidth
power bandwidth. See Note 3
Note 1: Channel Move Time and the Channel Closing Transmission Time should be performed with
Radar Type 0. The measurement timing begins at the end of the Radar Type 0 burst.
Note 2: The Channel Closing Transmission Time is comprised of 200 milliseconds starting at the
beginning of the Channel Move Time plus any additional intermittent control signals required to
facilitate a Channel move (an aggregate of 60 milliseconds) during the remainder of the 10 second
period. The aggregate duration of control signals will not count quiet periods in between
transmissions.
Note 3: During the U-NII Detection Bandwidth detection test, radar type 0 should be used. For each
frequency step the minimum percentage of detection is 90 percent. Measurements are performed
with no data traffic.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 10 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
Parameters of DFS Test Signals
Step intervals of 0.1 microsecond for Pulse Width, 1 microsecond for PRI, 1 MHz for chirp width and 1 for the
number of pulses will be utilized for the random determination of specific test waveforms.
Table 10: Short Pulse Radar Test Waveforms
Radar
Type
Pulse Width
(µsec)
PRI
(µsec)
Number
of Pulses
Minimum
Percentage of
Successful
Detection
Minimum
Number of
Trials
1428
18
See Note 1
See Note 1
Test A: 15 unique
PRI values randomly
selected from the list
of 23 PRI values in
Table 5a
60%
30
1 .
360
Roundup
19 ∙ 10
PRIμ sec
Test B: 15 unique
PRI values randomly
selected within the
range of 518-3066μ
sec, with a minimum
increment of 1μ sec,
excluding PRI values
selected in Test A
1-5
150-230
23-29
60%
30
6-10
200-500
16-18
60%
30
11-20
200-500
12-16
60%
30
Aggregate (Radar Types 1-4)
80%
120
Note 1: Short Pulse Radar Type 0 should be used for the detection bandwidth test, channel move time, and
channel closing time tests.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 11 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
Table 11: Long Pulse Radar Test Waveform
Radar
Type
Pulse
Width
(µsec)
Chirp
Width
(MHz)
PRI
(µsec)
50-100
5-20
1000-2000
Number Of
Number Of
Pulses Per
Bursts
Burst
1-3
8-20
Minimum
Percentage Of
Successful
Detection
Minimum
Number Of
Trials
80%
30
Three subsets of trials will be performed with a minimum of ten trials per subset. The subset of trials differ in
where the Long Pulse Type 5 Signal is tuned in frequency.
a) the Channel center frequency
b) tuned frequencies such that 90% of the Long Pulse Type 5 frequency modulation is within the low edge of
the UUT Occupied Bandwidth
c) tuned frequencies such that 90% of the Long Pulse Type 5 frequency modulation is within the high edge of
the UUT Occupied Bandwidth
It include 10 trails for every subset, the formula as below,
For subset case 1: the center frequency of the signal generator will remain fixed at the center of the UUT
Channel.
For subset case 2: to retain 90% frequency overlap between the radar signal and the UUT Occupied
Bandwidth, the center frequency of the signal generator will vary for each of the ten trials in subset case 2.
The center frequency of the signal generator for each trial is calculated by:
+(0.4∗ ℎ
ℎ[
])
For subset case 3: to retain 90% frequency overlap between the radar signal and the UUT Occupied
Bandwidth, the center frequency of the signal generator will vary for each of the ten trials in subset case 3.
The center frequency of the signal generator for each trial is calculated by:
−(0.4∗ ℎ
ℎ[
])
Table 12: Frequency Hopping Radar Test Waveform
Radar
Type
Pulse
Width
(µsec)
PRI
(µsec)
Pulses
per Hop
Hopping
Rate
(kHz)
Hopping
Sequence
Length
(msec)
Minimum
Percentage Of
Successful
Detection
Minimum
Number Of
Trials
333
0.333
300
70%
30
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 12 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
4. Test & Support Equipment List
4.1
Test Instruments
Table 13: Test Instruments List
Date Of
Due Date Of
Calibration Calibration
Description & Manufacturer
Model No.
Brand
R&S Spectrum analyzer
ESR
R&S
2017/02/20
2018/02/19
Signal generator
Horn antenna
8645A
BBHA 9120 D
CA3501-3501-G.90(3m) &
CA3501-3501-F.90(2m)
Agilent
Schwarzbeck
2017/08/11
2016/12/28
2018/08/10
2017/12/27
INFINET
2017/08/21
2018/08/20
RF coaxial cable
4.2
Description of Support Units
Table 14: Support Unit Information.
No.
Product
Brand
Model No.
Router
NETGEAR
NOTE: This device was functioned as a
R7800
Master
FCC ID
Spec.
PY315100319
5G Ant gain : 1.61dBi
Maximum EIRP : 25.47dBm
Slave device during the DFS test.
Table 15: Software/Firmware Information.
No.
Product
Router
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Model No.
R7800
Page No. 13 / 23
Software/Firmware Version
V1.0.1.30
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
5. Test Procedure
5.1
DFS Measurement System
A complete DFS Measurement System consists of two subsystems: (1) the Radar Signal Generating
Subsystem and (2) the Traffic Monitoring Subsystem. The control PC is necessary for generating the Radar
waveforms in Table 10, 11 and 12. The traffic monitoring subsystem is specified to the type of unit under test
(UUT).
Radiated Setup Configuration of DFS Measurement System
System testing will be performed with channel-loading using means appropriate to the data types that are
used by the unlicensed device. The following requirements apply:
a) The data file must be of a type that is typical for the device (i.e., MPEG-2, MPEG-4, WAV, MP3, MP4, AVI,
etc.) and must generally be transmitting in a streaming mode.
b) Software to ping the client is permitted to simulate data transfer but must have random ping intervals.
c) Timing plots are required with calculations demonstrating a minimum channel loading of approximately
17% or greater.
d) Unicast or Multicast protocols are preferable but other protocols may be used. The appropriate protocol
used must be described in the test procedures.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 14 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
Wireless Traffic Loading
Traffic Signal
Noise Floor
5.2
Calibration of DFS Detection Threshold Level
The measured channel is 5500MHz and 5510MHz. The radar signal was the same as transmitted channels,
and injected into the antenna of AP (master) or Client Device with Radar Detection, measured the channel
closing transmission time and channel move time. The calibrated detection threshold level is set to -64dBm.
The tested level is lower than required level hence it provides margin to the limit.
Radiated setup configuration of Calibration of DFS Detection Threshold Level
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 15 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
5.3
Deviation from Test Standard
No deviation.
5.4
Radiated Test Setup Configuration
5.4.1
Client without Radar Detection Mode
The UUT is a U-NII Device operating in Client mode without radar detection. The radar test signals are
injected into the Master Device.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 16 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
6. Test Results
6.1
Summary of Test Results
Clause
Test Parameter
Remarks
Pass/Fail
15.407
DFS Detection Threshold
Not Applicable
NA
15.407
Channel Availability Check Time
Not Applicable
NA
15.407
Channel Move Time
Applicable
Pass
15.407
Channel Closing Transmission Time
Applicable
Pass
15.407
Non-Occupancy Period
Applicable
Pass
15.407
Uniform Spreading
Not Applicable
NA
15.407
U-NII Detection Bandwidth
Not Applicable
NA
15.407
Non-associated test
Applicable
Pass
15.407
Non-Co-Channel test
Applicable
Pass
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 17 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
6.2
Test Results
6.2.1
Test Mode: Device Operating In Client without Radar Detection Mode.
Client with injection at the Master. (The radar test signals are injected into the Master Device)
DFS Detection Threshold
For a detection threshold level of -64dBm, the required signal strength at EUT antenna location is -64dBm.
The tested level is lower than required level hence it provides margin to the limit.
Radar signal
Noise Floor
Date: 23.MAR.2015
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
14:53:55
Radar Signal 0
Page No. 18 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
6.2.2
Channel Closing Transmission and Channel Move Time
Radar Signal 0
802.11n HT20
Radar Signal
Traffic Signal
Noise Floor
NOTE: T1 denotes the start of Channel Move Time upon the end of the last Radar burst. T2 denotes the data
transmission time of 200ms from T1. T3 denotes the end of Channel Move Time.T4 denotes the 10 second
from T1 to observe the aggregate duration of transmissions.
Radar Signal
Noise Floor
NOTE: An expanded plot for the device vacates the channel in the required 500ms.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 19 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
Radar Signal 0
802.11n HT40
Radar Signal
Traffic Signal
Noise Floor
NOTE: T1 denotes the start of Channel Move Time upon the end of the last Radar burst. T2 denotes the data
transmission time of 200ms from T1. T3 denotes the end of Channel Move Time.T4 denotes the 10 second
from T1 to observe the aggregate duration of transmissions.
Radar Signal
Noise Floor
NOTE: An expanded plot for the device vacates the channel in the required 500ms.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 20 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
6.2.3
Non-Occupancy Period
Associate test:
During the 30 minutes observation time, UUT did not make any transmissions on a channel after a radar
signal was detected on that channel by either the Channel Availability Check or the In-Service Monitoring.
1) EUT (Client) links with master on 5500MHz.
Waveform of EUT links up with Master
Date: 23.MAR.2015
16:27:51
2) Client plays specified files via master.
Waveform of transmission
Date: 23.MAR.2015
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
16:29:21
Page No. 21 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
3) Radar signal 0 is applied to the Master device and WiFi traffic signal stop immediately.
Radar signal applied to the master and traffic stopped as described in section 6.2.2.
4)
5500MHz has been monitored in 30 minutes period. In this period, no any transmission occurs.
Plot of 30minutes period
802.11n HT20
Traffic Signal
Injected into Radar
Noise Floor
NOTE: Test setup are shown on Test set up photo.pdf
6.2.4
Non-Associated Test
Master was off.
During the 30 minutes observation time, The UUT did not make any transmissions in the DFS band after UUT
power up.
Noise Floor
6.2.5
Non-Co-Channel Test
The UUT was investigated after radar was detected and confirmed that no co-channel operation with radars.
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 22 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2
7. Information on the Testing Laboratories
We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to
provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are FCC
recognized accredited test firms and accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025.
If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:
Linko EMC/RF Lab
Hsin Chu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab
Tel: 886-2-26052180
Tel: 886-3-6668565
Fax: 886-2-26051924
Fax: 886-3-6668323
Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Lab
Tel: 886-3-3183232
Fax: 886-3-3270892
Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com
Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com
The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.
--- END ---
Report No.: RF171114C19-4
Page No. 23 / 23
Report Format Version: 6.1.2

File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.6
Linearized                      : No
Create Date                     : 2017:12:25 09:13:17+08:00
Creator                         : Microsoft® Office Word 2007
Modify Date                     : 2017:12:25 09:13:33+08:00
Language                        : zh-TW
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 5.4-c005 78.147326, 2012/08/23-13:03:03
Creator Tool                    : Microsoft® Office Word 2007
Metadata Date                   : 2017:12:25 09:13:33+08:00
Producer                        : Microsoft® Office Word 2007
Format                          : application/pdf
Document ID                     : uuid:8a497938-cceb-4048-885e-84fdd9e3e0fd
Instance ID                     : uuid:444661a5-fabf-4959-b307-31f7fe76641a
Page Count                      : 23